I recently started reading the Percy Jackson series. It has an in-depth characteristic of each person in the book. When rick speaks of Clarisse she's a big brute, with a mean attitude. I think there was character misplacement in the movie. Clarise is a hot blonde! it doesn't make any sense. There's plenty a big brutish women out there that I'm sure could have played a better appearance role. Can you please recast the series? I know the Percy Jackson series is young; around 6 years old. But there's a lot of errors in the movies. Try again.

On a technical level, this movie is terrible. The effects are bad, the dialogue is cheesy at best, and downright cringe-worthy at worst. The acting is mostly god-awful, with a few decent performances sprinkled in. However, as a huge fan of the books, I still get enjoyment out of this film.I hated the first one for its huge deviations from the book. While this one certainly deviates, it makes a much better attempt to stick to the source material. A lot of sequences from the movie were directly from the book, and when this happens, it's extremely enjoyable. In particular, the Oracle of Delphi is exactly as I pictured it. Tyson is portrayed pretty much as I remember him. So is Annabeth. The large cyclops at the end (don't remember his name) was also done pretty much exactly how he was in the books, down to exactly how Grover manages to avoid getting eaten by him. They even included Clarisse's giant Confederate ship, which was in the book.Overall, despite the lack of technical quality, I enjoyed this film, and have watched it multiple times. If you are a fan of the books who didn't like the first one for its deviations from the books, you should find this one more acceptable, although not perfect.

This Percy Jackson sequel is just bad bad bad. I actually really enjoyed the first Percy Jackson movie, but this one is just misguided at every turn. I like Logan Lerman and it's not that he did a horrible job in this movie, it's just that his character hasn't changed any and it's become boring, his performance isn't necessarily bad, it's just dull and uninteresting. But Logan Lerman's performance is exciting compared to the rest of the movie, I could forgive a somewhat dull performance if the rest of the movie was good..... but it's not. The writing and the plot is very boring and doll and it doesn't do anything to keep your attention. That is this film is number one problem, it simply doesn't keep the audiences attention. The action sequences are pretty average and really aren't that cool, The special effects are just subpar, nothing all that spectacular. This movie looked exciting and adventurous to me, but the adventure is just in short supply. This was a very big wasted opportunity, because they could've done so much more with the plot. I thought the first movie was interesting and I liked a lot of things about it, but they just went a completely different direction with the sequel, and it's a dull one that almost lulled me to sleep. I completely suggest the first Percy Jackson movie, but I suggest skipping on this sequel, it's not worth your time. 1/10.

Gone was the magic, gone was the adventure. ..replaced by silliness of the highest caliber, with what appeared to be a pathetic attempt to make up for such a lackluster film, with CGI.From dead Confederate soldiers, to what I *think* was supposed to be a new twist on the Stygian Witches, this movie was a nightmare from the get-goThe only positive thing I can say about this disaster is that, at least all the main important characters from the original, reprised their roles (except Chiron) and if it hadn't been for that, this movie wouldn't have been worth suffering through for even fifteen minutes, let alone the whole thing.Avoid, at all costs, avoid.