This is yet another Re-watch, ,I have seen this movie 3 times now, as I saw this before seeing the original.I really loved this movie, I found it to be a lot of fun but not as fun as the Original.This as some really nice gory deaths, which I really liked, effect are so fun to watch and some were just playing weird, even for the Wishmaster series. Andrew Divoff is outstanding playing the Wishmaster, his face just give you the creeps. The lead actress went bit over the top with some of her acting in the , some of cast were really bad in this, the most of them were decent, they could have done better. I loved the last scene in the movie, thought it's was so funny!, I didn't like some of effect near the end, I don't think it fitted well with other gory effect that worked really well with the rest of the movie. Not as good as the first but still a fun to be had in this gory sequel.6 out of 10

Andrew Divoff continues to own, in this samey/samey sequel. It's ridiculous, going for laughs and gore, but never a scare. The moment someone says "I wish my lawyer would go f*%k himself!" You know you're in for a treat. It may not make any sense, but at least it was entertaining in a weird way. The film shouldn't be taken seriously, but it should at least create some rules for its mythology. It seems that the Djinn can now pick and choose which wishes he grants, and manipulates them in ways that don't make sense. There's also too much God talk, from a terrible Paul Johansson. To top it off, our heroine is a murderer. In a film like this, you're not going to be able to connect the audience with a complex character, so why bother?

I watched the first movie and I watched this sequel movie yesterday. Of course, an excuse was needed to free the Wishmaster again... what were the chances to free him again? Anyway, I was expecting to find many creative gory scenes. One was cool and another one was funny... but in general, it was a huge disappointment. The first movies seems to show more of those. At least they were better. The first wish was an obvious contradiction if it was taken literally (that was supposed to be the fun of the accomplishment of the wishes: they were taken too literally). It reminds me the disappointment when I watched the second Elm Street Nightmare...There were many limitations I don't remember to find on the first movie. For instance, the djinn now has to collect 1001 souls before the last 3 wishes. Since there isn't a good creative story, the writer just made up that excuse to fill the gap between the preamble and the "final fight". More of those when the main character starts to make some wishes, although one of them is understandable.The God, Devil, priest and Christian values don't mix well with the story, based, supposedly, on Babylonia or Persian beliefs. Is it a mockery of Christians? The djinn just looks like a pervert with that silly smile. I don't know when he's mocking or doing something else. Bad acting, bad story, bad movie.

Wishmaster is a unique horror film because it uses the genie legend but makes it evil, another good thing about it was horror icons like Robert Englund, Kane Hodder, Tony Todd and Reggie Banister was in it. Andrew Divoff did a good performance as the Djinn.Now the sequel, like most follow ups their direct to video because it may not live up to the first film. Wishmaster 2: Evil Never dies is not that bad really, Andrew Dvoff returns as The Djinn and does a another great performance as him, the gore effects are nicely done. The plot is kind of odd since the Djinn needs 1001 souls before he grant three wishes from the waker when before he didn't but that doesn't matter.A good film with some decent gore affects. Check it out. 8/10