This was so much better than I was expecting. This is was a movie that really pulled me into it. I loved that this was a nice slow burn and it is so refreshing to see a thriller/horror without a lot of cheap jump scares. It had a few moments of creepiness that was just right for making this a thriller. I held me in suspense. The actor played his part really well and even though this is a low budget movie, I only noticed a low budget "feel" a couple of times. I only have a couple gripes about it. I know that "Rosalind" is supposed to characterized as an eccentric personality but I didn't like that there was so much clutter found inside the house. I felt that they could have took some of that stuff out to open up the surroundings a bit more and it would've been just as effective. I also wasn't to crazy about the ending. I totally understood it but the way it ended left me a bit unsatisfied. I would suggest this to a friend.

The movie in one and a half lines: A guy moves to his recently passed away mother. Totally random, no sense and useless things happen.The end.Don't try to act like a movie expert that feels the art of this piece and is capable of understanding a hundred of ideas passed by the it... Just accept: this movie sucks more than everything.I don't need bloody, scary movies, what I need is movies that express something interesting. And what this one expresses is boring as... There is no word for this.My advice: don't waste your time watching this. The trailers look really good (the movie actually has some good elements), but it evolves to nothing and boringness.

When I had just finished watching this film, last night, I needed to punch the writer in the face. For real.Clive Barker called this film 'Unique'? Really? Well I guess it is a completely new way to disappoint an audience.This is a style of writing I classify as 'Eggs In One Basket' - you are completely pivoting the entire plot on one thing impressing your viewers. Fail that, and the entire thing fails. And it did.I can see what the author was trying to do, and this is what I mean by 'redeeming features' - so much implied stuff, forcing your imagination to do the scare. That was rather nice, and very creepy.But they got something wrong, oh so wrong:They gave expectations.Expectations that were never delivered upon. Up comes the final scene and ...I'm writing this the next day now, which I made myself do - I needed to calm down. As I say, I badly wanted to punch somebody, the author being the most logical choice.Now that I've gained some perspective, and got over the bitter, stinging disappointment the film ultimately delivers, I can see some merit in it.But not much.3/10, up from 1/10.Now don't do it again!

I don't know what other users expected or wanted to see...But I actually liked this one.Gudiño's first shot at not shorts. He quite nailed it! Gudiño takes us into the very self of his characters; we get to know them, to feel what they felt. Guy enters mother's home in hopes of selling, because she has passed away; guy starts to feel, hear, see things...It looks like the very same formula, but, Gudiño takes it one step up, if not a couple more.Innovation finally arrives in this genre. A great start to build a pretty good future for Gudiño.