Holy hell, I'm old enuff (54 @ the time of this rabble rebuttal, fyi) to know that 97.62% of humankind are UTTER idjits, but I am quite honestly FLABBERGASTED by the negative comments on this hugely satisfying, big-hearted & enjoyable remake of Disney's classic 2D animated flick (a film I saw 3 times as a child when it was released, I loved it so much).I could single out individuals, but I won't - suffice to say, while all the star turns in this were pretty good overall (with the notable hexception of Idris Elba - whose line readings as Shere Kahn were so godawful that I actually thought it was Tom Hardy voicing our favourite misguided tiger until the credits rolled - yes, Idris was THAT bad! But I dgress...), I thought that without Neel Sethi's truly hexceptional performance, this movie could have TANKED. Not since Anna Paquin's Oscar-winning performance in 'The Piano' have I seen a child actor so utterly unaffected and BELIEVABLE - top marks, in my book - witch, frankly , is a MUCH better one than half the commenters here seem to be reading from!).I grew up on Rudyard Kipling, thanks to my Mum, who got it from HER mum, and to all those know-nothings who found this "too dark", I say "oy vey"! I especially snorted at one 'cotton-wool-wrapper' parent, who worried this film would be MUCH too dark for most 11-year-olds. Are you KIDDING me?? Y'know I could try to re-educate sincerely misguided folks like you right here right now, but I have better things to do with my time - just Google ANY article on the BENEFITS of Grimm Brothers' original unbowlderised versions of the classic fairy tales instead, & let the rest of us get on with the REAL bizness of preparing our children for the REAL world out there, m'kay? M'kay! LmfaoPhew! I think I'm done here. Normally I ignore stoopid "reviewers", but the number of you gathered here, like brainless sheep gathered 'round a watering hole (ooh! Slick analogy! Haw) have irritated my bowels SO much, I have to wonder WHAT film YOU were all watching - cos, flawed as it is (yes, I agree with one commenter that it was difficult to not "see" Bill Murray talking into a mic every time Baloo opened his mouth - undoubtedly more of a FLAW in the ANIMATION than Bill's fault - oh, & to the person who felt Bill's performance was AS BAD as when he voiced the woeful Garfield - hey - you're WRONG.) , this film ROCKSCheerz! Lozz (of 'The Horrorscope' review site)

Bring us to the life of jungle with a lot of messages

This is was a very great remake of the original movie and this is one of 2016 best movies. This movie has great special effects and the story is good. This is almost like the lion king. I really enjoyed the film since it had great action and it's songs. This was really a big entertainment film and it was one of the greatest remakes of all time. It stars Neel Sethi as mowgli, Bill Murray as ballo, Idris Elba as Shere Khan and Be kingsley as Bagheera. It also had Scarleet Johnson as Las. Jon Faverou is a wonderful director and this is one of his smarteat movies to date. I give jungle book a 10/10.

This adapation of the orginal film made my jaw dropped a numerous time. I didnt think I could make this adaptation as good as the orginal animation they did but they proved me wrong. The stroyline was the same, with the same animals and characters it was amazing. I would recommend watching this to anyone who loves Disney films and absolutely loved the orginal, you think theu couldnt top the orginal animaton, well they did with this! I hope they do a good job with the adapted version of the Lion King with what they did with this one.