In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds
In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds
R | 03 November 2011 (USA)
In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds Trailers

Granger, an ex-Special Forces soldier gets thrown back to medieval times to fulfill an ancient prophecy. Venturing through the now war torn Kingdom of Ehb, he teams up with an unlikely band of allies with the goal of slaying the leader of the "Dark Ones". Fighting against all odds, they must free the land from the grasp of the evil tyrant Raven and save the world.

Reviews
Michael Ledo

Dolph plays Granger, a marshal arts instructor and ex-military man who is transported back in time to fulfill a prophecy about defeating evil. If the accent and bad acting of Lochlyn Munro as King/Raven doesn't make you laugh, stay tuned as the acting gets worse. The king's sorceress (Natalia Guslistaya) who transport Dolph dies, but her spirit sticks around a few scenes to help Dolph. Michaela Mann plays a bad actress who Dolph is too tired to have sex with.After a little bit of wine, Dolph goes from telling the king to "stick his prophecy..." to "let me at the B...." He must kill the Holy Mother (Christina Jastrzembska) most likely due to her rejected Renaissance performance. Natassia Malthe (Bloodrayne: Deliverance)is the King's doctor who will accompany Dolph on his quest after he takes her virginity. She reminds me of a horrendous medieval Mila Kunis. Meanwhile the king will work on attempting to fully grow out his beard.Dolph realizes things aren't the way he is being told and the water isn't purified. This sets us up for the twist...and a dragon.No f-bombs, sex, or nudity. Some minor Pg-13 words and sexual innuendos. With the bad acting, simplistic plot, and language it would appear the movie was designed for a tween to early teen crowd, but due to the violence got an R rating, placing it in the worse of both worlds. For serious movie watchers, 1 to 2 stars. For young teens about 4 stars. Might do well during an MST marathon

... View More
Valin73

The only thing I enjoyed about this movie was ....The Cover... It has Dolph in a suit of armour and a nice fortress that was not seen in the movie.....But they did have in the 43rd minute.....(As the guards close the fortress doors and the camera pans out...in between the right side of the fortress and that big tree.....you'll see an Automobile, 4 door I think.... lol)And what was that camera shot with the king setting his wig at the beginning. I thought that it would be significant later on in the movie...but No..Nope!! definitely not a keeper

... View More
lpposs

I picked this up at the video store because I'm a sucker for this genre. While I hardly thought the first movie was great or even good, it was at least watchable, fair, I think someone else said and I would agree. Given that there are so many really bad movies of this sort, I latched onto this hoping it would be at least equal to the first, even though Dolph in the lead role almost made me put it back down. Alas, it's as bad as I feared it might be. I'm third though it and don't know I can finish it. Dolph's character's moaning about just wanting to be left alone, left to sleep and let's just get it over with seem quite sincere, I believe that's exactly how he felt during the filming. Jason may not be everyone's favorite actor, but he manages to keep that angry mood notched up through the first film and it helped keep the film from becoming as boring and pitiful as this one is shaping up to be.Not sure one can "spoil" this movie, but spoiler alert because I'm gonna describe a "scene"I'm cringing, the 'healer', after a spat with Dolph, comes back and says "If we shall perish anon, I will not die unfulfilled" then immediately starts taking of her clothes while Dolph says "unfulfilled?". Then sighs, rolls his eyes and says "Oh, right" and lays back for her to have her way with him. Really? I mean Really?

... View More
tjabbalabba

Well, what can u say. You cant blame Uwe Boll for not trying, can you? Make no mistake, this movie is not going to disappoint you - IF you are a true Uwe Boll-fan. Im NOT. You might think Uwe Boll learned from his mistakes from his last movies, but his directing style is not going anywhere - it is still utterly horrible. Two worlds does not have a big budget as some of Uwe bolls other movies, nor are there any bigger names to talk about either. The story is just plain stupid and the way it is told is even more stupid. At some point you will wonder if you are watching a bad comedy or something, cause you simply cant take it seriously. I don't even have to tell you what the movie is about cause you will most likely turn the movie off before you even passed the intro-scene anyway. The movie does not even qualify for television, its that bad. The only reason i watched this movie was to see HOW bad it was. Considering all the movies Uwe Boll has directed, and not progressed an inch from it, Uwe Boll must be the worst director ever out there.

... View More