I actually remember when this thing came out and how excited I was and how it got some attention from the horror community. Then sadly I rented it (yes kids from a video store) and remember being super disappointed. I decided to return to it again recently to see if this thing had maybe managed to age well. And my answer is no it was crap in 2006 and its crap now. There's no style, no real EC comics homages, and no involvement from Romero or King. Instead this was brought to us by the team of Ana Clavell and James Dudelson, who for some reason managed to get there hands on the rights to this and Romero's "Day of the Dead" they also made "Day of the Dead 2: Contagium (2005)" a movie which I haven't seen but have heard is absolute garbage. After an opening which includes some of the most piss poor animation available we then get into five tales. "Alice", "The Radio", "Call Girl", "The Professor's Wife", and "Haunted Dog". The only two decent ones are "The Radio" which stars AJ Bowen, its way to long and eventually over stays its welcome, and the other being "Call Girl" which blows its load to early and ruins what could have been a decent tale, but, still has some nice creature effects. The rest are just goofy wastes of time. Something this film actually manages to do and I've heard people give it credit for this is how the stories manage to intertwine with each other, this was unique for the time, but, new and better horror anthologies like "Southbound" have managed to do it way way better, here it never really helps the plots of the tales. Both Clavell and Dudelson have talked about a potential fourth film since this movies release. Let's all hope the zombie apocalypse happens before that.

THIS is a sequel to the first two...???? Since when?I more than agree with the prior reviews here. This is an utter train wreck. What began promising quickly escalates into pure and utter nonsense. What the devil (no pun) were Clavell and Dudelson thinking? Apparently zilch. There is absolutely zero plot, mediocre acting (at best), and no script. It is merely a "chain" of nonsensical hooker story action that goes nowhere... fast. At least with the first two, action and lines flowed decently - connecting Romero's origination. This fiasco makes a mockery of that with its own pathetic 'twist'Stay with the real horror film rubes. This is not close to crap.

I really enjoyed creep show 1 & 2. This one had some bad acting and wasn't really scary at all. I will not buy this movie,it was nothing like the two previous ones.If you really like the first two creep shows , you might not like this one. This one is not as mysterious as the first two. The acting isn't as great as the first two as well. The last one was the worst one and the acting was terrible,but the first two stories in in was okay and bearable to watch. I just didn't get why it was so different from the last two creep shows. Me and my mom were excited to watch this, but it was a totally disappointment.Like I said this was not what I expected i expected greatness , because of the first two creep shows.

When I bought this I had never seen this before and come to think of it I wish I hadn't. the movie is awful the only good bit is the 1st tail which is "Alice" which was quite good but then you think whats the point in watching the rest when your watching it.The directing is one of the worst I have ever seen EVER. the acting is awful, it sounds like their not even trying or the person who did the script just hates movies or was wrote by a 10 year old. The stories are awfully written it makes you feel the were written in 5mins.this should not be called a Creepshow film as i love Creepshow 1 and 2 and it has stained the Creepshow series. do yourself a favour and watch the first or second Don't watch this