Seriously, why was this movie even made?For one, this movie is just completely horrible and not in a good way. Like you know you have your "Movies that are so bad it's good," Well this is a "Movie that's so bad, it makes you angry." For one, the kids in the movie, make you question how the heck did they take over the town? Were all the citizens there just weak people or elderly people. There was also just only one police officer, just one! I mean, these kids couldn't take over a block let alone a whole town. The only one that looks slightly bit intimidating is Malachi, and he doesn't even have a personality. More to add, what kind of a film is this supposed to be? For one, with Burt having PTSD and reminiscing a Vietnam War setting, you forget it's Children of the Corn, but at the same time how can I blame you? The constant arguing between Vicki and Burt just make your head explode almost since it goes on for pretty much the entire first half of the movie. The worst part of the movie, Isaac. The thing about this Isaac is that the kid is just hilariously annoying and just makes you want to tear your ears off when he talks. The thing about John Franklin's Isaac is that he's actually good at the acting and is making a case for being scary. This Isaac, although he's trying hard, he just annoys you.Not to mention, this is what the 8th movie if you add the movies all up. Why?Again this movie is just bad and like I said earlier, take you this movie and destroy it. Do it now or your punishment shall be 1000 times, 1000 deaths, each one more horrible than the last! No not really, just I would highly recommenced you DO NOT check this movie out.2/10, I give it 2 stars, it would be one star, but it's one of the only SyFy films that doesn't have horrible CGI.

As an enormous fan of the original which was (relative to the modest budget and laughable SFX) well done, as a remake, this version left much to be desired. Surprisingly, this was co- written by Stephen King himself. I'm reflecting comparisons to the original, and thus not meant for first timers. Burt and Vicky constantly bicker. It's obvious they don't like each other, in spite of being married. In the original, they were unmarried and the only ongoing major disagreement they had was about him making a full commitment. Regarding casting, I was confused. Burt being a white ex-marine with signs of PTSD, and Vicky a black woman, too often whiny and obnoxious. The race change made no sense, save for attempting to be more "P.C." which is completely out of place here. I may have missed it but it was unclear to me exactly what they were doing driving in the middle of nowhere, whereas it was briefly explained in the original. The original Isaac was a tough act to follow, but this young "actor" just doesn't fit the bill. There's nothing creepy about him for starters. His lines are rushed and lacking any sense of fear or authority through his inflections. As an actor he didn't seem to have a full understanding of what he was saying! Perhaps not his fault, as his intentions/motivations were seemingly explained poorly to him. The story begins "twelve years ago" (1963) and takes place in "present day" (1975), however Isaac, among others, hadn't aged during this long period. One may recall that in the original the year was ambiguous, mentioning only "present day" and "about three years ago". Much of the music is the same with several minor changes. The ultra eerie child chanting music is there but not nearly as loud or significant. The 1984 film can be a fine example of how score can make or break the overall feel. The Malachai character often overacts, as if he's trying hard to live up to the bizarre nature of the original role played by Courtney Gains. The rest of the children speak in unison so often that it loses its eerie nature after awhile and just seems contrived. One thing I did like was more interaction of the children with each other. They talk, they eat together, etc. These elements left unresolved curiosity in the '84 version. It hardly saves the film, though. The majority of the acting is stale and lifeless. Job and Sara are taken out of this one altogether. Essentially it's Burt against this world. An interesting church scene shows two of the older kids fornicating on the pulpit in front of Isaac and the rest of the kids. Pretty gutsy for made-for-TV to have nudity, sex movements and noises while kids cheered on excitedly. I thought it superfluous to have Burt running from the children through the corn experiencing Vietnam flashbacks. The running alone would have sufficed, especially since it was shot almost to the letter to the description in the short story. The kids stop cold when they get to the foot of the cornfield, obvious that they have a learned fear of entering the corn without the presence of their leaders. Another element that brought this down as a horror film is that these murderous children are just simply too normal. They have more personal dialogue here, but it was too often and too "everyday". With the exception of children acting in unison, holding weapons, and wearing dated clothes, there wasn't much else strikingly unusual. The cinematography was halfway decent. Many shots paid tribute to the original, like the corn "coming alive" around Burt. It's difficult to swallow the relationship between Isaac and Malachai because without Isaac's creepiness there's no intimidation factor. Being that Malachai is a bigger and older presence, it doesn't work. Burt and Vicky's actors have zero screen chemistry. Also because of Vicky's annoying nature, I never cared about what happened to her. The end result of her fate was disturbing to see, not because it was her, but rather because it was anyone. This yarn creates very little sense of much needed chills, fear and scares. It missed that special ingredient that makes great horror. Vicky's scene towards the end was notably disturbing and well done. I at appreciated their staying loyal to the original story. This had potential but just didn't hit the mark. Like many M. Night Shyamalan films, we wait and hope that something big and exciting and grand will happen, but it runs out of gas early. The last 15 minutes is worth watching for true fans.

I actually enjoyed this remake. Here is a review that is about the good stuff, not the bad.The remake is definitely stays faithful to the short story by King. The original is awesome but hardly follows the SS. This stays true and you will notice the similarities if you have read it.I think the acting is wonderful. The boy who plays Isaac is creepy and adorable at the same time. I believe Malachai is better this time around than the first. He seems a little more darker and more intimidating. Burt and Vicki player by David and Kandyse do a great job as a couple who are having problems. Their acting is believe able and nothing tacky.Being a big fan of COTC, I think this should not be looked over. It is way better than some of the sequels.

The children of the corn was a very well good comeback. The children's cast did a great job. The children of the corn series is a phenomenal horror series and many audiences such as myself has been watching it for a very long time including the "Children of the Corn" (1984) classic. This remake brought the entire series back to life. Rating and Reviewing many horror films, family films, etc. "The Children of The Corn Series is by far my number one favorite horror series for all time." I recommend this remake including the classics to those who love children of the corn and the entire series. Like, I stated this remake has brought it back to life and it would be great to see more made beyond measure.------------- Overall, amazing performance by Preston Bailey and the entire children's cast. Great directing by Donald P. Borchers. Stephen King, a big thank you as well. Many audiences may not had like this remake but above all this was a good remake to keep the series flowing at it best. God bless Children of The Corn.