BloodRayne 2: Deliverance
BloodRayne 2: Deliverance
R | 18 September 2007 (USA)
BloodRayne 2: Deliverance Trailers

Rayne, a half-human half-vampire warrior, is in the America's 1880's Wild West to stop the vampired Billy the Kid and his posse of vampire cowboys.

Reviews
adonis98-743-186503

Rayne, the half-human/half-vampire warrior, ventures to America's 1880's Wild West to stop the vampired Billy the Kid and his posse of vampire cowboys. BloodRayne II: Deliverance is nowhere near as good as the first film that even tho it wasn't great or even a good film it was at least a fun guilty pleasure, the main girl who portrays BloodRayne might be good looking but looks aren't everything and this film was even super slow boring to the point where the viewers will fell asleep. Overall it's kinda better than the next one but still not a good film and nowhere near as good as the first. (4/10)

... View More
Eric Stevenson

For a lot of bad movies, you can simply say to yourself that the person making them is probably a wonderful person in real life. Not with Boll. He actually physically attacks his critics and once backed out from a fight because the critic was a good boxer. I know little about boxing, but could try my hand at him. This is another one of his awful movies. They say there's no good direct to video movies, especially when the original film was terrible to begin with. This manages to even worse than the original as it repeats the mistakes and actually adds some new ones.So this movie takes place in the Old West and it's pretty easy to say that this is the worst Western I've seen in my entire life. Was this something from the BloodRayne games? I don't know and I don't care. It's awful no matter how you look at. We get to see the same idiotic slow motion scenes over and over. After the first ten times, it really becomes aggravating. He does this same thing again when a woman has sex with a guy after meeting him for a minute or so. A lot of this movie is filmed in the dark and it's just ugly to look at. This isn't your "Alone In The Dark" movie, Uwe.This film is also just plain mean spirited. There are actually scenes where children are being bitten and have their blood sucked out. There's a scene where half a dozen of them are about to be hanged at the same time. The scene where the guy cuts himself so Rayne can drink his blood isn't very pleasant either. There's one character who's a priest that talks about how God is sending people to Hell and hates gays. Guess what? He's actually a good guy! There's this obnoxious fat reporter who keeps appearing too. It looks like he's going to die a few times, but he unfortunately lives. 1/2*

... View More
Destroyer Wod

I never gave 1 before, my first time, i usually find something positive in everything, but here i can't. The movie was boring, and i could have give it 1 or 2 more stars if it wasen't a total butchery of one of my favourite game ever... I am still to date a huge Bloodrayne Fan, having the comics, the games, the statue(limited, costed 275$...) and even tough i may not be as much as before into it due to the fact that games are done(i have doubt about this DS version i eared) and even the comics seem to be done. But i remain a big fan and when this piece of garbage came... i couldn't believe it... The first one was bad, but it did tried to incorporate some element of the game like Gore, Rayne's costume not too much far from the game, the Brimstone society... But it had lot of things bad(Rayne's hair being wrong, no green eyes, story far from the game) Its pretty much stupid because its not like there is 10 games release like Resident Evil and they have to incorporate stuff of the more recent one to stay up to date, here they had only 2 games to deal with. And the funny thing is neither of the 2 movies are based on the 2 games. I can understand Boll wanting to make a kind of "prequel" to the first game(even tough some things don't fit) but he had no excuses for this cowboy sequel... Worst part is that the third movie is coming out and its based on.... yes the first game... talk about something stupid. Anyway to get back on this movie, it have nothing to do with the game... Rayne's hair are black, no green eyes once again, her blades are barely use(she almost use only guns), the costume is miles away from the game, the gore is almost absent, the villain is crap (and never saw in the game) and the whole story is boring as it can be. I do love Natassia as an actress(she was pretty good as Ayane in DOA), but she IS NO RAYNE at all, and she is returning for the third movie....yeah right... Anyway this Bloodrayne 2 is really the biggest slap in the face ever to a video game franchise... even more than Mortal Kombat Annihilation or Street Fighter that where awful but tried a little to had things of the game.

... View More
jobocamom

Number one, changing Rayne's actress was a huge mistake. Two, the storyline was excruciatingly slow and beyond unbelievable. We waited and waited for something to happen... what happened to Rayne? At the end of the first movie, it appeared as if she had obtained all three Talismans, which would have made her the most powerful vampire (albeit a Damphyr), but in the second movie she was weak and stupid. Come on, after centuries of fighting vampires, you would think the fights would be a lot more interesting and believable. If anyone asked if they should watch this movie, I would tell them to either run like hell or if they are into being tortured, to go ahead and watch it. It is not worth the money. We were EXTREMELY disappointed.

... View More