Even Anaconda 2 aspired for cinematic release. Anaconda III is pure straight to TV goodness. The snakes look more computerized than ever, having a shiny, plastic texture. They can slither over any terrain without affecting it in any way. Never fear, to clean up this problem is David Hasselhoff, giving his best performance since Nick Fury. It's hard to detach Hasselhoff from his offscreen persona, so it's kind of funny to see this celebrity running after CGI snakes. The plot is also ridiculous. No longer are these just big snakes out to eat people, but they've been genetically enhanced and have started a family. If you love this kind of crap then you'll get some smirks from it all. But why bother, when the first Anaconda had respectable people making fools of themselves, rather than jobbing actors chasing another pay check.

I've heard that this was the worst of anaconda movies, but I've found it surprisingly entertaining.Giant anaconda that was mutated for experiment is on the loose. The movie runs very much like the Python if you've seen it. Giant snake slithering around and people hunting and running away depending on which scene. The story is bit thin, but acting is good, and twist and turn in the story keeps your attention glued to the screen.Not a complete wreck by any means compared to some other monster creature based story. Recommended for a view.

This gets my vote as the worst of the Anaconda movies. As a sequel and on its own terms, Anaconda III is wretched. The scenery/sets are quite nice and Crystal Allen is decent, but that's it. The photography is flat and rushed and the film looks as though it has been edited on a bacon slicer. The continuity is inconsistent as well complete with poor gore effects, the writing is vacuous and eye-rollingly cheesy in alternative to funny and the story is hopelessly predictable. The direction is sloppy, the music is generic and forgettable, the film is unevenly paced and unsatisfyingly resolved and the characters I didn't feel anything for. The acting is just dire, David Hasselhoff and Crystal Allen are the only ones who try and while the enthusiasm is admirable Hasselhoff is embarrassing in his acting and delivery, Allen however is far more believable and manages to be the film's sole redeeming quality. The other actors look bored and uninterested, and any scenes that tries to be suspenseful, atmospheric or frightening fails, instead it is laughable. Overall, dreadful sequel and film. 1/10 Bethany Cox

I approached this movie with trepidation, even though I had seen both the first two movies I wasn't really sure what to expect, although the title gave me a clue. So I thought - what the hell! Plus it was a free rental, which kind of swung the deal for me. And it has the Hoff in it.. if only briefly. The plot is Python (Monty)-esque waffer thin, as is any sequence which involves any form of blood spilling - think "Black Knight-arm cut off" from Holy Grail and that's the realism you're dealing with, i.e not very. Add in a few squashed people, some decapitated people, a plot twist that you can see coming from, oh, the 2nd minute maybe. Don't be fooled by the "offspring" part - the only baby anaconda you see is right at the end, even then I think it's another snake playing a stunt anaconda. People have said that the Anaconda doesn't look like a real one, well I wouldn't know for sure what a real one looks like, I do know however that, much as cats only see in black & white, Anaconda-vision sees everything in orange. Much like viewing the movie through a Quality Street wrapper. Which may improve it.. Its a ho hum way to pass 85 minutes or so, nothing new or earth shattering and if you've seen either of the previous 2 you'll have an idea of what to expect. Mostly worth viewing to see one of the many ways to execute the Hoff... :)