VENGEANCE OF AN ASSASSIN is the swansong of action choreographer Panna Rittikrai, a guy who kept the action genre alive in Thailand for three decades until his untimely death last year. This is the guy who brought Tony Jaa to the world in ONG BAK and WARRIOR KING, along with making fine films like BORN TO FIGHT along the way. His recent Thai martial arts movies have been disappointments, and VENGEANCE OF AN ASSASSIN the last of those.It's a frustrating film to watch, because the storyline is all over the place and the script is very poor. This comes from a viewer who has no problems with the story of WARRIOR KING. Key sequences are rushed over or missed entirely so that the viewer always feels wrong-footed and not entirely sure of what's happening, particularly at the outset. Around the halfway mark it becomes a straight action film with no story but you're still left with questions at the end.Still, the action is what we're here for, not the daft story or the non-existent acting, and I'm pleased to report that the action is good. VENGEANCE OF AN ASSASSIN is filled with the kind of old-school stunts that we know and love from Thai cinema, alongside tracking-shot shoot-outs and quite brilliant martial arts scenes. These fights are more brutal than ever before, with Thailand seeming to take inspiration from the hits of their neighbouring country, Indonesia (THE RAID films). A garage fight that takes place midway through and sees hero Dan Chupong letting rip with a sledgehammer on his victims is the highlight for me. Yes, the CGI train stunt is appallingly poor, but like WARRIOR KING 2 I enjoyed this film nonetheless; I've lowered my expectations for Thai cinema, so this kind of nonsense doesn't bother me at all.

I came into this movie like all other SouthEast Asian movies.. with almost no expectations for an interesting story or credible acting. I came only for the action and was intrigued in what new they would bring to the martial arts genre.Thai movies like Ong Bak and "Bangkok Knockout" pride themselves in their gritty stunt work, and this movie continues that tradition. The action is very well choreographed and brutal. I have a feeling the majority of the budget went into medical bills for the stuntmen. There are a several major action sequences (about 6 if I recall correctly), and most of them were really well done.So if you're coming into this movie expecting any sort of logical plot or a smidgen of decent acting. You'll most likely turn it off after 10 minutes. It's grade school level acting. The plot is a complete mess and it makes me sad that the Thai movie industry cannot come up with any decent script writing.So, if you're a martial arts junky like me, you'll find a good amount of entertainment in this movie, but be warned, you'll have to wade through a fair amount of fake crying and overacting.

very bad screenplay, very bad directing, very bad acting, but the fighting scenes are pretty good, just like most thai action movies. the most ridiculous part of this ridiculous film is the gun fights, the main character with two long guns fighting so many foes but still ridiculously wearing windbreaker and dark sun glasses... hey, guys, we are in thailand, right? it's a hot country, you don't wear long windbreaker in the hot and humid thailand, okay? wearing dark sun glasses indoor, in fighting? could you see clear? the bullets seemed never used up, the bullets just kept coming out, shot everything up, hand guns, long guns, whatever, endless bullets never empty. two young men who never learned close combat skills, were just two mechanic apprentices in their uncle's crappy shop, yet was suddenly learned thai boxing overnight, the other one just learned it from couple of VHS video tapes. yeah, great and fast self-teaching learning genius. those gun shots so easily to heal, and when the uncle guy was shot dead, then the next scene we saw, he's giving final words to his two young men he supported.the whole film is just messy patch-up works, awkwardly put together with ridiculous storyline, scenarios and childish plots. the only thing worth watching is those thai stuntmen's knocking over, knocking down, falling from several stories height, bumping rails or anything. those stunts were top-notched and incredible. besides that, there's nothing in it, just stupid elementary and predictable crap. 2 stars are for the stunts, nothing else.

Tony Jaa may be the face of 'Ong Bak' and 'Tom Yum Goong', but bona fide aficionados of Thai action cinema will tell you that the real star behind these international hits is Panna Rittikrai. Indeed, Rittikrai was Jaa's mentor and fight choreographer on both the aforementioned movies before graduating to taking Prachya Pinkaew's place as director of both the 'Ong Bak' sequels through Jaa's existential crisis. If we've started our review on a somewhat sombre note, it is because 'Vengeance of an Assassin' has turned out to be Rittikrai's final work. At age 53, Rittikrai passed away earlier this year, and this film is dedicated to his loving memory. And yet even though it was never made with that intention, this gritty hard-hitting action spectacle is undeniably a befitting tribute to Rittikrai and his legacy. Co-written and directed by Rittikrai, it is an unabashed throwback to the action movies of the 80s and 90s when action was the operative word of the genre and elements such as plot and character were secondary, so much so that the good guys were unreservedly good and the bad guys were, well, bound to meet their deserved end.Pittikrai's priorities are clear right from the thrilling opening sequence, where a bunch of mostly shirtless guys with great abs are playing a game of indoor soccer as if their lives literally depended on it. No matter that we don't yet know who is who, every kick and punch is so bone-crunchingly real that we cannot help but marvel at Rittikrai's choreography and execution. Even when that standalone sequence is finally revealed to be nothing more than a dream for our lead character Than (Nathawut Boonrubsub), the adrenaline ride is more than worth the narrative gimmick. Like we said, the plotting here isn't the film's focal point, and serves no more than as a form of connective tissue for the series of equally jaw-dropping action scenes to come.It follows too that storytelling isn't Pittikrai's strong suite, so do be minded to forgive him for the messy way in which events unfold. For the record, the idea here is that Than and his older brother Thee (Dan Chupong) lost their parents at a young age and now looked after by their uncle (Ping Lumpraploeng). Curious at how his parents died, Thee sets out to uncover their true identities, and through an old family friend, stumbles into the underworld as an assassin for hire. His latest assignment is to kill Ploy (newcomer Nisachon Tuamsungnoen), the daughter of an influential politician; unbeknownst to him, his employer has only engaged him in order to take the fall for Ploy's assassination.Thee goes on the run with Ploy, which puts him at odds with his employer(s); unsurprisingly, they turn out to be connected to his parents' death, thereby giving him, Than and his uncle the chance to avenge their loss (hence the title of the movie). Rittikrai and his co-writer Wisit Wachatanon try to weave a gangland thriller with power plays and double-crosses, but the needlessly convoluted setup is merely excuse to let Chupong take out a whole bunch of baddies on his own before meeting his match in the foxy "Nui" Kessarin Ektawatkul, another one of Pittikrai's protégé from his 2004 film 'Born to Fight'. It is also eventually an opportunity for Boonrubsub to showcase his moves against chief villain Chai's henchmen, in the same one-against- many style before similarly culminating in a more evenly matched mano- a-mano showdown.Rittikrai's language of movie-making has been through the hands, legs and everyday objects that his characters use as weapons against each other, and true enough, his film only truly finds its groove after the half-hour mark when its characters finally get to speak to each other in the language Rittikrai knows best. Trust us when we say that it is well worth the wait, as Rittikrai minimises the kind of wirework that has marred Asian action cinema of late and sticks to the sort of raw unflinching violence that will undoubtedly in turn make you flinch. Against equally crude backgrounds such as garages and abandoned factories, Rittkrai lets his characters go at each other in a no holds barred manner that will see faces smashed, jaws torn open and other assorted body parts being crushed.Oh yes, it certainly is over-the-top, in particular a typical 80s Hollywood-style sequence where Tee and Than try to rescue Ploy from on board a runaway locomotive while their uncle and Ploy's family doctor named Master Si Fu attempt to take down a helicopter from their Land Rover using machine guns and RPGs. We're not sure if the poorly done CG backgrounds while Than fights off a seemingly never-ending stream of bad guys on top of the train were intentional, but it certainly adds up to the gleefully retro feel of the sequence which could very well have come straight out of a Chuck Norris or Sylvester Stallone movie back in the days. You can't quite fault it for being exaggerated if you're going to enjoy the sheer nuttiness of it, just as how you'll have to accept that Than could have learnt his moves simply by watching and practising that displayed by his parents on some old videos his uncle doesn't want him to see.This being a Rittikrai movie, you can be sure every single one of the actors can actually fight; and yet it isn't Chupong and Boonrubsub who manages to surprise us but the elderly Malaysian actor named Ooi Teik Huat who plays Master Si Fu. It is a delightful supporting role that captures both the exuberance and the energy that this B-action movie has in spades. If it's action you want, it's action you'll get in Rittikrai's latest and last, and while cynics can easily tear the movie apart for its flaws, we'd rather just indulge in its guilty pleasures and enjoy the sheer adrenaline rush it affords its audience.