It has been almost six years since the first and only time I have seen this movie. Yet it is still quite memorable, for all the wrong reasons.Anyone who is familiar with Ed Wood would know the Z-movie as a film which often has a gory storyline, yet is created with a lack of artistic interest. The special effects in 'Out for Blood' show no effort from any cinematographer apart of the production.Luckily most of the actors are somewhat attractive and are constantly being intimate, which gives people a reason to continue watching. The soundtrack is quite great, which includes a cover of the 'Lost Boys' theme, "Cry Little Sister". The makeup of the vampire transformations look like masks rather than theatrical makeup. Not to mention the fake blood which strangely resembles cherry sauce from Chinese food!I honestly wish there was something slightly more uplifting. Any film is a gamble to make, but one can tell the filmmakers of 'Out for Blood' didn't make a strong effort. Even major vampire fans would be offended. Not to mention the major insult to classic director F.W. Murnau by having Nosferatu in this film, shortly killed in the same scene.Then again, all the vampires die in this film, of course.If you're still intrigued by this theme after enduring 'Out for Blood', The Twilight Series, and the dreaded 'Fright Night' remake, watch 'Dracula (1933)', 'Bram Stoker's Dracula', or 'Interview with the Vampire'. Better yet, to where it all began, 'Nosferatu'.

I missed how excited I used to get when my parents would let me rent a movie, I would always run straight to the horror section, didn't matter wither or not if I heard of the film, I just had to see some kind of horror movie. Lately, that just hasn't happened, but I just wanted a cheesy and very over the top horror film, I guess you can say my tastes have officially grown, because this movie was beyond ridicules. I mean, to start with the acting, good Lord, these "actors", which the three main leads, I have seen before in films, I couldn't believe it. I mean what happened? Did they leave their talent in the car? I just don't know.From what I gathered, this is a pretty simple plot: Dective who is very hot tempered and obsessed with his vampire loving ex wife, he is on a "stake" out... get it? Stake out? LOL... eh, for a girl who has been missing, he finds her very easily, she seduces him, but little does he know, she's a vampire! Oh, no! What will our hero do?! Well, he gets bitten and is about to become apart of the undead, with the "help" of his ex wife, can they stop the inevitable? Oh, man, that is that plot that is so easy to laugh at, the funny thing I was watching the making of this movie and the actors said the script was good and suspenseful! LOL! Why is it I think they just needed a quick buck? Believe me when I say that you will very much understand what I mean if you come across this movie. It's very over the top and I think I just have to retire my love for the cheesy horror films, before I loose it.2/10

I watched OUT FOR BLOOD when it premiered on the Sci-Fi channel last summer and although I was expecting it to be slightly better than it was, I still found it to be better than most movies that premiered on the Sci-Fi channel in the past few years. Low-budget like all of the Sci-fi channel original movies, some of the effects are a bit cheesy, but most of them are decent enough. One would expect the special effects to be the highlight of a vampire film like this, but the highlight is actually Kevin Dillon's performance. His performance almost makes up for the clichéd script and occasionally weak directing. Despite the flaws of OUT FOR BLOOD, it still an entertaining picture that never left me bored and given a better budget and script, could have been an above average vampire flick. I give it 5/10.

The movie was not bad. It wasn't great either. I enjoyed it, so it gets points for that. It was relatively predictable, the effects were kind of mediocre, but Lance Henrickson was good, the girls were cute, and it was about vampires, so hell, it couldn't be all bad. I think, had I paid 8.00 to see it in a theatre I would be a bit ragged off. But in that all I lost was a couple of hours on an early Saturday night... I am content. I would give it 6 fang marks out of 20 (remember there are two fang marks to each bite... smile) Watch it on Sci-Fi but I wouldn't spend more than a 4 dollar bargain bin price on the DVD if and when it comes out. As for me, I am going to pop open a pabst blue ribbon and watch House of 1000 Corpses again.