This movie is slow from beginning to end and nothing about it really scares me. The one strength I can find is Bela Lugosi's performance as Dracula. Everything else was weak and felt mediocre in its execution

I liked this film to an extent. Some parts did bore me a little bit and other parts kept me intrigued. Overall it was a good horror movie for this particular time frame. The ending was questionable as to what the guy planned to do after the couple had left and we see the guy put the stake up to Dracula's heart but we do not really see him actually kill him, so it leaves you with some questions. This film had a good screenplay and some good actors and a good setting so overall it was a good film.

ANYONE And I Mean Anyone - That Rated "Dracula" Less Than 6 Stars Should Not Be Allowed To Review ANYTHING At This Website...There Should Be A Field That One Has To Click When Subscribing To IMDB, That Indicates Your AGE..!Then When Reviewing A Movie - The READER Has A Barometer Of Which To Base The Writers Review On..!I'm 66 Years Old Now And For The Lets Say, The Past 20 Years American Movie Making, And The Caliber Of It's Actors Is An ABSOLUTE JOKE...In Fact it's Downright F-ING Pathetic..!"How DARE YOU - You "Articulate Incompetents"...Go Smash A Car, Or Blow Up Your MOTHER - You CGI PUNKS..!The Future In Film - May NEVER Come Back To AMERICA EVER AGAIN..!

I thought that Dracula was a extremely interesting film. I enjoyed that it was one of if not the film that put vampire movies on the map. The lighting in this film was excellent. The lighting really contributed to how creepy and gloomy the film felt. I also really enjoyed the sound. When in Dracula's castle you can hear eerie noises and scratching. Both lighting and sound really made this film for me. Plot wise the film was average. Overall I enjoyed this film and think it deserves a watch especially if you enjoy monster flicks.