Although the story is different from the G1 cartoon, the movie's action, special effects and CGI are great. The Autobots are great heroes. The Decepticons are menacing villains. The plot is very heroic and action-packed. Overall, it easily has to be the best of Michael Bay's Transformers movies.

Movie Review: "Transformers" (2007) - Engaging hungry-for-more director Michael Bay to fulfill childhood dreams in a live-action version of "Transformers", producer Lorenzo Di Bonaventura under executive producer Steven Spielberg unleashes first steps in fully immersive image system of plate photography, live-action character shots towards a Computer-Generated-Imagery (CGI) polishing by deluxe visual effects company Industrial Light & Magic (ILM) to be overwhelming in four years later skyscraper strangling introduction of decepticon Shockwave with by now perfected cinematography created by Amri Mokri in an extended 50 minutes showdown sequence of an apocalyptic city of Chicago, Illinois' hyper-realistic science-fiction war zone.Here at Transformers' first installment the showdown comes in at a running time marker of 35 Minutes. Nevertheless the extremely decisive choreography of metal-splintering, fire-sparking and urban concrete-dismantling Los Angeles downtown action scenes, let the spectre guess what else may want to path in the near future, where digital technology opens up opportunities to build maturing R-rated storyline in a science-fiction action scenario with hints of ancient mythology and psychological character arcs for a growing community of international audiences. Director Michael Bay at the time of producing season 2006/2007 renovated most scenes as the frequently reacquiring Highway chase scenes in following installments, always finding missing pieces of raising stakes in impossible to conceivable action scenarios at first looks.The initiative "Transformers" of 2007 follows a fairly simplified path of teenager Sam Witwicky, portrayed with utmost comedic-pacing talent by Shia Labeouf, who clearly found his match with actress Megan Fox, who furthermore does not shy away to just be the side-kick for the main character, playing along with additional supporting character as Agent Simmons, performed with a full skill set of professionalism by actor John Turturro, who rightfully reprised his role in the successor movies, which wanted to enage more processing CGI data in order to knock the audience awestruck in metal-on-metal fighting alien robots, where it should have been the embrace of humanized combat confrontations as well as a partially received encounter between love-interest fighting actors Patrick Dempsey and Shia LeBeouf, while Optimus versus Sentinel Prime takes place on the bridges of Chicago, marking the ultimate action highlight in the series with "Transformers: Dark Of The Moon" (2011).© 2017 Felix Alexander Dausend (Cinemajesty Entertainments LLC)

I wish I like it like I use too. Transformers more like Product Placement the movie. The reason why I'm avoiding this film because it's dull but I have too just to let my thoughts out. If I was directing this movie I would made a better plot, better story and fix up the few scenes that are offscore: 5.5/10

Ten years ago, Steven Spielberg and Michael Bay kick started what would eventually become one of the most financially successful and bombastically dumb summer franchises in film history. So putting aside any thoughts or premonitions about the function of this fiasco, it's worth looking back and asking how the original Transformers bodes as movie.In the first hour, Bay succeeds in summoning some laughs out of Shia LaBoeff and his new car (the autobot Bumble-Bee in disguise). Keeping this a secret from his parents makes the hiding of ET look like a piece of cake. Enter Megan Fox, the potential love interest. When we meet her, she is inspecting a car engine, bent over it as if posing for a playboy cover. She goes through the movie with almost as little to do as she has to say; a reminder that the women in Michael Bay movies are objects. Bay's floating swirling camera work signifies everything that is simultaneously right and wrong about him; he is a exceptional pornographer. The focal point of his direction has always been making the shot look good. In terms of performance there is nothing wrong with the camera work, but ironically its perfection is distracting; as is the application of slow motion. LaBeoff has enough energy and tongue-in-cheek to make the first hour of the movie tolerable. Halfway in we meet Optimus Prime in all his chrome bodied glory, with the sombre godly voice of Peter Cullen. He gives a cue card explanation of his job and his enemy the Cybertrons. These moments may conger feeling of nostalgia for anyone who grew up on the 80's series. For the rest of us, Optimus' lecture makes you realize how cheesy an idea Transformers really is.Bay stages a loud numbing climax that is the film's greatest undoing. It starts with a punch that catapults an eighteen wheeler so beautifully that it would have been more thrilling to have seen the actually rigged effect on set. he may have a good eye for camera, but when it comes to editing he is virtually blind. The action takes place in the kind of dense metropolis where all the buildings are the same colour, and there is no sense of orientation. It feels as if every shot is only two frames in length, and at the speed of the unfolding chaos makes it impossible to distinguish the Autobots from the cybertrons. Perhaps more than anything else, Transformers' biggest problem is that is that the Transfomers themselves are nothing resembling characters. They have no feelings, and their dialog seems manufactured. Certain lines are exactly what you expect to hear when you press the button on the toy.