bsmith's comment wasn't correct, "several hundred thousand and hundreds of reporters and editors" makes NO sense lol.This film is good and i did enjoy it but it was very sad and definitely not for the faint hearted. The bit where the filly break her foot isn't very pleasant to watch. I have only seen it once but would watch it again. I do love horse riding and I would like to be a kind jockey, so i am really into these films. I can only watch it on youtube so if anyone knows any FREE sites to watch films on please let me know. There are some good parts in this film like where they do try to save the filly instead of putting her straight to sleep.

I saw this movie when my mom rented it from Netflix. I never actually saw Ruffian race in life (i was born in 1988) I've read all about her and saw the actual footage of the match race when i watched the document about Barbaro on abc. the film perfectly depicts her life though short. The whole battle of the sexes theme carried to the extreme was kinda stupid but i guess it was the major thing of the times with the Bobby Riggs vs. Billy Jean King showdown and all the feminist movements and all. The only other complaint that i have is that the horses chosen to play the parts were plain in comparison to the real Ruffian who was tall, very leggy, and well muscled. I got the DVD for Christmas and there's thing on the bonus features where you can watch an On the set Documentary. In it the director says that they had to experiment with some dye in order to get the horses the right color a near black. Why not just find horses who are naturally brown/black. Of course it might kinda hard considering that there has never another filly quite like her since. The other horses that played her rivals throughout her career were well selected Overall I loved this film and would recommend it to any horse/animal lovers.

The 1970s were the height of the battle of the sexes. Men and women were in open combat, anywhere and everywhere: tennis (Riggs vs. King), the voting booth (ERA), and, on July 6, 1975, Belmont Park, when the undefeated Ruffian was sent off at 1-20 odds (you had to lay 20-1 odds on her) to defeat the Kentucky Derby winner, Foolish Pleasure, mediocre in comparison to Ruffian.Period pieces are not easy to shoot, since they are done from memory and historical records. I was alive and following the New York tracks as a youth, and became aware of Ruffian in the spring of 1975, after she had blazed her way onto the front pages as a legitimate Kentucky Derby threat. Today, she would have run for the roses without a second thought, but her owners were old-school and gave it not a second thought.This film captures the phenomenon that was Ruffian, from promising ace-in-the-barn that her trainer knew would win her debut at 4-1, but not by 15 lengths in 1:09. No matter how good they look in training, you never know what's going to happen when they actually run. Ruffian answered every question asked of her, even winning when slightly injured, finding the heart to put away her strong-but-weaker peers.Ruffian was a freight train, and while the details of the film were glossed over, this was a TV film and that is often the case. Watch "Babe Ruth" from 1991 (TV) and "The Babe" from 1992 (Feature Film) for simimlar disparity. Indeed, you could also read the "Seabiscuit" book from 1997, and find it much richer than its paperback predecessor, "Come On, Seabiscuit!" from 1975.This was the discount version of the Ruffian story. The big-budget treatment she may one day get awaits.Ruffian was the first horse ever buried in the infield at Belmont Park. That is how special she was. She died of a broken leg because horses like her cannot live even long enough to recover on one, as they are simply born to run, her like no other.

More annoying to me than the horse racing inaccuracies were the portrayals of journalists who covered Ruffian. This was 1975 -- not 1935. Snap-brim hats with "Press" cards stuck in them were long gone by the 1970s. And the newsroom at Newsday, Nack's employer, was a joke. The place looks like it's a weekly, with perhaps five people working in it, rather than a major paper with a circulation of several hundred thousand and hundreds of reporters and editors. And there's always only one editor around. Moreover, Nack's desk, which for some crazy reason has an adding machine on it, is nearly empty and spotless -- which could never happen. And he has a 1950s vintage manual typewriter. Even in 1975, most big newspapers had electric typewriters. Getting the little stuff right always helps to make the big picture better.