It's fascinating to see this and glimpse any hint that Peter Jackson would move on to Lord of the Rings, and inspire a generation of grooms to hire Gollum impersonators to present the ring to their startled bride. Anyway, yes Meet the Feebles is gross but it's meant to be, and it's a New Zealand flick that is worth checking out after a Hobbit movie.

I watched this movie yesterday as a random chill plan of healthy and cool procrastination: watching movies about little monsters. So after 'The Gate' (a good one) and Munchies (don't watch it), it was Meet the Feebles turn. And well, we still have like 5 more 80's little monsters movies to watch but I'm quite sure this may be the best. IT'S A MUST WATCH. Indeed. I mean, the idea is just pretty good: making kinda of a drama/black comedy story about what happens behind a big, famous, theater musical... What, you thought I'm talking about "Birdman" now? No, this is totally different. This whole thing is made with puppets. And not Henson's puppets. They can be as cute as creepy, as funny as kinky, as wise as dirty. I don't know. Is far way more violent than Birdman (if we're going to continue with the comparison)... And it has some characters that are good, still trying to do the right thing, while in Birdman we have a big bunch of crazy selfish actors trying to do everything for anything.Of course, it is a MUST WATCH only if you are into B movies, 80's movies, cult classics or whatever... This is quite an accurate choice. Terribly disgusting sometimes, so be mindful with what you are eating while watching'... More than anything is just as mad as hilarious. I'd say go for it.Diego Olivas Arana

Got to be one of the most infantile, ridiculous films ever made. Good puppets and some amusing voice acting aside, I see no reason to recommend this film to anybody, for any reason; any intention Jackson had in mind is completely lost. It may be easy for some to assume that disliking this film is just an indication you only know him as the LOTR director, but in fact I am a fan of some of Jackson's work, both the big budget stuff and the small, and I appreciate that he pushed the boundaries of taste; I have no issue with the tone, I just wonder what made a talented film maker spend so much time on something so putrid, aimless and dull.

Hollywood executives must have lobotomized Peter Jackson when he started the "Lord of the Rings" franchise, because his earlier New Zealand productions were so much better.Just look at this sickly cracking showbiz satire, complete with an array of mostly disgusting Muppets from hell, acting as a walking compendium of the seven deadly sins (and some more). The sheer audaciousness of this nightmare folly is to be applauded, but the astounding fact remains that behind all the cold misanthropic viewpoints on display there's still a beating heart pumping warm blood into this creatures.Certainly not to everyone's taste and riddled with too many drawn-out plot excesses, this one-of-a-kind pic still deserves a huge cult following.7 out of 10 panty-sniffing anteaters