This movie was funded by the Saudi royal family. Also, it's creators are members of SETI. True fact.If you study this movie real real close you will notice it was filmed and edited with a technology that is not even available to humankind.Hospital records prove the Director of this movie has no ears. It's true. He's some kind of mutant. If you don't believe anything else, believe this: you can't trust mutants.The intention of this movie is to destabilize our government and destroy civilization as we know it. You know that hot girlfriend you got? Well, she's going to end up in a harem and you, you my friend, will be fodder for alien experiments.Mark my words. You'll see.

Watching this, I thought I was going to hate it, for I hated the one called "In Plane Site," but boy was I wrong. At first I was like, "Okay, what do these wars have to do with 9/11?" And when I received my answers, my jaw dropped to the ground. But I don't believe everything this documentary said, but it certainly gave me a whole different view on this horrible day. And to learn that we will never know the full truth since all the debris from the building was removed really insulted me, for we will never ever know the full truth thanks to the evidence being removed. Although I never had any connection to 9/11, I feel as if I do. And along with the families of the victims, I too would have protested in removing the crash site. Thanks to that, we'll never know the full truth! But this is worth watching.

I've been a skeptic of the 9/11 myth since 9/11/2001, just based on what i saw and heard that day. When i began to learn others questioned the official story i was thrilled to learn more. Then in 2007, when Dylan Avery and Korey Rowe produced their first edition of this documentary i was overwhelmed and have shared the film in its various incarnations with well over a dozen screenings. It always has an impact. I see that other IMDb reviewers have labeled people who challenge the official version of 9/11 as the "tin foil hat brigade," but considering the number of times our government has straight up lied to us and then been caught, i was say the tin foil club are the people who blindly accept whatever swill our government puts out. As Jesse Ventura recently vented on "The View, "My government killed 58,000 of my generation in Vietnam on a lie, what makes you think they wouldn't sacrifice 3,000 to get what they want?" Over the past several years, initial small-timers now transformed into internationally acclaimed activists, Dylan Avery and Korey Rowe have challenged the official story of 9/11 with a series of spectacular documentaries, not just re-edits, but whole new films, continuously evolving their presentation as newer evidence comes in. In a scientific approach, they have formed hypotheses, presented them, and then rejected and replaced them in favor of other approaches as different info comes to light. The several different installments of "Loose Change" have continuously refined the message,tossing aside the more sensational claims made in earlier incarnations and now Avery and Rowe have formed a pretty solid indictment by the time they finished "Loose Change: An American Coup." The problem for me, was i liked the sensational stuff of the earlier versions better. And the breathless narration and the driving music. Once upon a time "Loose Change" was a sensational knockout that felt as subversive as its subject matter, now it's a very good, very serious film. The dilemma for us as audience is that veracity has come at a price of entertainment value, not by much but enough to where it is worth noting if the viewer hasn't seen any other versions. The second edition i felt was the strongest version,though it turns out some of their original assertions didn't hold up. But the pacing and the music of the earlier versions of this film series were so much more entertaining, it is sometimes hard for me to remember the newer editions are "improvements." This most recent edition is also more polished, done with a bigger staff, more elaborate in establishing its veracity and more historically grounded, just not as pulse-pounding. Don't misunderstand though, this series is one of the most important docs ever to circulate and one of the biggest causes in American history and this edition has the best set of facts presented in the most rigorously evaluated way. Show this version to anyone who hasn't seen any versions since its version of the truth is the most probable.All that said, after you've seen their "truest" vision, go back to earlier editions for the more exciting film making. Maybe Avery and Rowe still haven't found all the answers, but they make a solid effort with a series of progressively more professional quality films. I don't know if they'll ever get to the bottom of the mysteries around 9/11, but they've certainly learned how to be movie makes par excellence while on the quest.

First of all when you watch this or if you have already, then keep one thing in mind, ... this film quite literally names countless people as being "in on it" or "having inside knowledge" including the FDNY (who risked and sacrificed their lives that day) to a BBC News Station because a reporter said the WTC7 had collapsed 20 minutes before it did. For one thing, I seriously doubt our government would let a European news station in on them being the mastermind behind the worst attack on US soil since Pearl Harbor. Seriously? Also, go watch the news reports again, everyone was talking about the WTC7 coming down because the firefighters heard it groaning and it was fully engulfed and had a giant chunk taken out of it. The news station misunderstood "It will come down" for "It has come down", due to how many people the news passed through on the way to the reporter. They also claim that no plane hit the pentagon and that it must have been a cruise missile despite all the eye witnesses and a number of light post that were knocked down, which could have only occurred if the missile did some serious zig zag maneuvering to hit them before striking the pentagon. I think a planes wingspan hitting them seems more logical. Go type in 911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77 in youtube and you will get a very clear picture of what happened. I could go on and on, but if you take some time to research yourselves then it's not hard to find the facts. However, if you want a good place to go with a great presentation of the facts then you can visit http://www.youtube.com/user/RKOwens4 . It contains several videos closely examining the different accusations and even sheds some light on new information.