This "documentary" is a turd. Plain and simple. Much like the Kennedy assassination people will believe whatever it is they want to believe. Case in point. Our Government can't even build a functioning website with an army of people and $600 million dollars to do it with. In an age of all out social media, the internet, and 24 hour news cycles this garbage just proves that the human race, especially people who believe this "inside Job" crap, are getting dumber by the day.Let's look at another conspiracy and how dumb people are. When crop circles first started popping up in England everyone thought they were made by UFO's. Idiots everywhere came out in their tin foil hats marveling at how no human could have done something like this over night with out anyone seeing or hearing anything. Whole crazy people industries started popping up around this. Suddenly, 2 old British dudes came out and said they had been the ones making them. They showed how they did it, and how they did it so fast, and their demonstrations came out as perfect replicas of the "UFO" ones. Not being able to do something that big and that fast turned out to be entirely possible and only needed 2 old pranksters, 2 wooden planks, and two pieces of rope. Still their are idiots running around refusing to believe that, still say it is ufo's and using all sorts of technology to claim radiation is being emitted from them and every thing else. Grow up and put on your big girl panties believers, truthers, or what ever you call yourselves. At least the Kennedy conspiracy was a small bit believable since most theories talked about a few guys on the grassy knoll. For 9/11 to be an inside job would have taken hundreds of people to be perfectly organized which if you have ever human beings at work, you know that is just impossible.

Watching this, I thought I was going to hate it, for I hated the one called "In Plane Site," but boy was I wrong. At first I was like, "Okay, what do these wars have to do with 9/11?" And when I received my answers, my jaw dropped to the ground. But I don't believe everything this documentary said, but it certainly gave me a whole different view on this horrible day. And to learn that we will never know the full truth since all the debris from the building was removed really insulted me, for we will never ever know the full truth thanks to the evidence being removed. Although I never had any connection to 9/11, I feel as if I do. And along with the families of the victims, I too would have protested in removing the crash site. Thanks to that, we'll never know the full truth! But this is worth watching.

The previous editions of Loose change that I had seen were crackpot nonsense. Some of their suggestions, like the idea of phone calls from Flight 93 being fakes, would be laughable if only they hadn't been so insensitive to the families of the soon to be victims.I viewed this at a screening in a venue by the name of 'The Frontline club.' This edition of Loose Change is the best version I have seen. Several of the utterly absurd suggestions, that were presented as undoubted fact in the previous releases, are gone. The narration is far classier as well.However, the dishonesty seen in this 'documentary' is still utterly reprehensible.This film shows no pictures of the remains of flight 77 during the clear up operation and investigation and instead suggests the insane idea of a military plane hitting the pentagon. It focuses on the poor videos and pictures of the impact and prior to the impact and insists there isn't any clear evidence that flight 77 struck the pentagon. But it ignores the flight 77 debris and most of the passenger's DNA that was found at the site of the pentagon.The film suggests that the fireballs and compressed air getting ejected from the towers as they collapsed were actually detonation blasts! It devotes a sizable portion of the film to Stepehn E. Jones, the physicist and now retired professor who never and presents his theory of the twin towers being brought down by controlled demolition as compelling evidence. However it ignores that Jones's theory has been met with criticism by people who do have a background in building collapse forensics and by Brigham Young University's (The university Mr. Jones served at) department of civil environmental and engineering. While it is true that chemicals of thermate were found in the dust, there were natural sources for these chemicals to come from. This documentary is incredibly biased in not dealing with questions raised about Stephen Jone's paper and ideas.The coverage of WTC 7 was disgraceful! To suggest, as this film did, that there were just a few controllable fires in the building while showing footage of only the North face outrageous! While its true most of the footage taken of WTC 7 was taken at the North side, there is fortunately some footage from the South side that shows the extent of the raging fires being hosed down by fireman, and not showing any let up. But unfortunately, none of this was shown.If your looking for a good story and 90 minutes of entertainment, then this is fair enough. The music and editing were good, the narration was well spoken and dramatic. But if you want an assessment of the conspiracy theories out there, I would suggest an impartial program that doesn't deceitfully neglect footage that counters their agenda.

Simply put, this is the best of the Loose Change permutations so far. All the facts are laid out in clear fashion, and the music soundtrack is thankfully more subdued and muted this time around. The narration by actor Daniel Sunjata is an improvement over director Dylan Avery's sober but somewhat weak turn as narrator of the last Loose Change entry.All in all an impressive, polished presentation in terms of the look and sound, but, more importantly, it gets most of the important facts out into the forefront.Foremost amongst these facts are the findings of physicist Steven Jones - PhD, who discovered, along with his team of scientists, explosive/incendiary material in all of the samples of 9/11 dust they have acquired (over 20, from different sources, independent from one another) and how they have proved that this material is a form of highly powerful Nano Thermite which ignites at temperatures high enough to cut through steel. This material is not Sulfur as one commentator erroneously stated. It exists in the form of small chips - gray on one side, red on the other - that ignite at around 430 degrees centigrade, and produce tiny spheres of molten iron of the exact same chemical composition as molten iron produced as a by-product of ignited Thermite. Through a process termed "X-Ray Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy" it has been proved by Jones and his colleagues that the microscopic particles comprising the bulk of the red part of the chips are nano particles (1/1 thousandth the diameter of a human hair) of iron oxide and elemental aluminum - the exact key ingredients of Super Thermite, or Nano Thermite. This is incendiary material that can be made to be explosive when other elements such as Silicon and Carbon are added, and both of those elements were also identified by Jones, et al as being intimately mixed in with the Iron Oxide and Aluminum. Their findings have yet to be adequately refuted by any official investigative body. In fact, none of the four official investigations, including the last and "exhaustively carried out" investigation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology even bothered to look at the dust, nor did they even consider any hypothesis other than collapse due to damage and fire, even though it is required by law to test for explosives in any fire investigation. Some investigation.So we have a material found in all the dust samples that consists of the exact ingredients of a known material that can cut through steel, that ignites at 430 degrees centigrade, and that produces molten iron spheres as a by-product just like Thermite, but it is not Thermite? If this were not enough, we have pools of molten metal at the bases of all three buildings six weeks after their collapse, and video showing molten metal literally pouring out of the south tower beginning five minutes before it's collapse, and the molten metal looks absolutely and positively like the molten iron produced by Thermite (go to YouTube and type in "Thermite 9/11" to see for yourself). A fact totally ignored by defenders of the official story is that the heat produced by the fires did not exceed 800 degrees Fahrenheit, a temperature far too low to even weaken steel let alone melt it. It seems that they never let the facts get in the way of their faith in the official dogma.Then there is the testimony of Housing Authority official Barry Jennings, who along with another man by the name of Michael Hess were witnesses to massive explosions inside WTC Seven before either tower had collapsed. As if things were not suspicious enough, Jennings died suddenly last August, two days before the final NIST report on the collapse of WTC Seven was released (NIST said it was due solely to fire - yeah, sure) - it goes on and on and on and on.Attacks on this documentary, and the whole 9/11 "truth movement" in general, are becoming increasingly ineffectual, indeed embarrassing in light of what we now know.Dylan Avery and everyone involved in this production are on the right side of history and will be vindicated, in due time, along with all other unbelievers of the official story. Good for them.