"I, Robot" is not your average sci-fi flick. It has some deep and rich themes. It is very human in a robot way. I know it sounds weird, but when you watch it, you know what I mean. Will Smith is a very realistic character. Though there are some cliches at times. But those are minor complaints. The visuals are stunning, because of the fact that this was released in 2004. I, Human Being recommend this. It's not flawless, but it's definitely a solid take on robots.

Call it something like "Super-Cop in Robotland" and it might have been alright, but call it I, Robot and it's really hard not to anticipate that the writers have at least read the book "I, Robot". The movie feels like someone briefly explained the creators that "It's like a book about Robots and there are these three laws and stuff" and then they wrote the script.If you like action you will probably enjoy it and the story is not without its moments, but if you're a fan of Asimov and like intelligent Sci-Fi then avoid it... or at least only watch it to get your rage on.

Everyone is excited about having a friendly robot doing errands but there is an increasing trend of smart people telling us to not naively trust something other humans have created. This movie steps into that debate and although it has valid arguments for both theories, in the end a cautious judgment about everything and everyone wins the day.A great movie that does show us a plausible glimpse of our (not so distant) future, and one that makes us think about where we are going in terms of technology and the future of mankind.8 out of 10 to a movie I enjoyed watching.

The movie I robot is the Isaac Asimov's book of the same name. The movie is about a policeman against advance technology, where people depend more and more on thecnology and less on themselves. In a near future where robots become a part of daily life in the cities to make easier the process. There are three laws that govern the robots: Law I: A robot may not harm a human or, by inaction, allow a human being to come to harm Law II: A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the first law Law III: A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first or second lawThis laws may seem contradictory so they can preserve at all costs humanity. But when humanity doesn't want protection, what happens? If I order a robot to kill someone that may or may not harm, they must obey. But according to their laws they can't, because they are not killing machines. So the mere purpose of robots is to reduce to statistics and calculations so they can act, even against their owner. So their rules become null when there is a higher purpose at hand, they act on duty but we don't. https://pensarparaserfeliz.wordpress.com/2017/04/09/i-robot-and- minimalism/