CONTAINS SPOILERS--The only reason I rated this movie 2 instead of the 1 or 0 it truly deserved is that the acting, overall, was really well done, particularly the main character played by Teri Polo.Here is what I would have done at the end, if my family ever, even under such dire circumstances, would have treated me in such a way. I would have acknowledged that, yes, it did keep me from my drinking and smoking. Thanks. And then I would have sued that unethical psychiatrist and the staff to the point of any financial ruin possible. I would also have taken that ring, which apparently within 5 minutes won her back, and thrown it down the nearest sewage hole on the street, filed for divorce, and told the husband he could have the "best friend," as I would never have trusted either of them again, much less in the 3 minutes it took for him to convince her that he "did it all for love." Oh, and I would have sued for, and won, total custody for putting my one living child through a month of believing I was dead. Lastly I would have gone to the police and suggested jail time for all involved, as they wasted huge sums of taxpayer money in this endeavor to again show me that I was crazy, to say nothing of a false police call involving multiple officers when she reported her situation to them after escaping.Lastly I would have gone to the press, or possibly Lifetime Movie Network, and told my story for the world. Oh wait that part was done already:).And I would then have gone on with my new life.

This was a solid movie. The performances were good throughout. One weak actor can ruin a movie, but there were none. Teri Polo was very good in a difficult role. Chaz Palminteri is always compelling. He manages to bring honesty to every role and underplays beautifully. The writing was clever, and a nice departure from what normally passes as a thriller. The screenwriter did a nice job of conveying a lot without repetition. Good use of misdirection. I thought the score could have been better - it felt inserted at times. Most importantly, though, the story flowed well and accomplishes the key task of any film - it keeps the viewer wanting to know what will happen next.

I have seen some preposterous films in my time but Taken for Ransom/Final Recourse really is up there as one of the silliest. Even with the ridiculous story line this still fails to be sufficiently entertaining. The plot tries to be clever with numerous twists but they are so contrived and unconvincing that rather than being impressed you are left irritated. Everything about the film is amateurish, the acting, the dialogue, the script. Terri Polo fails to convince as the lead although to be fair to her she was the best one in this and even the best actress in the world would have struggled in her role. The bad guys were bad caricatures and the supporting cast especially the husband were wooden. The ending really does defy belief. It is so ridiculous and laughable that it falls into the so bad it's good category and the only reason I didn't rate this film a 1. I can't recommend this film to anyone other than those looking for an a laughably ludicrous film to watch. Quite how this currently has a rating of 5.6 is beyond my comprehension. Just awful.

I enjoy a good psychological thriller. This one has it all: suspense, challenging plot twists, good writing that keeps you guessing every step of the way.The ending was interesting and tied all the other parts of the movie together.The acting was excellent, and the dialogue keeps you on the edge of your seat.So sit back, grab the bucket of popcorn, and wait for the thrills to start.The movie has a great deal of adrenaline rushes. And so often, what you think, is not.When they disclose at the end of the movie the who's whos, many will be surprised and shocked.So get your blanket out, stay warm, and enjoy the movie.Definitely worth your time to see.