I guess they tried to create a vampire film. It fails on every level you can think of: from acting to make-up to cinematography to the story. Everything just fails. So badly I couldn't watch it, I had to fast-forward through it to finish "watching".They bring us nothing new except a few new people becoming vampires. It's one of those "wannabe" films, it wants good and the actors are wannabe vampires. I wannabe a Hollywood vampire too but I don't create stupid films to fulfill that fantasy. Why can't they just leave vampire films to the "big boys", ya know the well-seasoned filmmakers? Just because you know how to work a camera and can dress up in a Halloween costume does not mean you are good at film making and acting.1/10

A callous slumlord brings a vampiric infection home to his dysfunctional suburban family on the same night that some of his tenants show up to teach him a lesson. Much bloodshed ensues. When someone asks me to a recommend a genuinely entertaining low budget, straight-to-video gore fest, this is one of the few that gets the nod. Director Desi Scarpone and writer David Birke manage to deliver some genuine humor and chills in this film. It is energetic, nervy, and often gratuitous – in both gore and nudity. The father is a fun character who revels in his corruption and evil. He's one of the few memorable characters I've seen in a recent DV horror film. Is this film for all tastes? No. Is it a shining example of film-making? No. Is it always coherent? No. But let's face it, if you're reading this review, you must already be a fan of bad horror films. You could certainly do worse than this.

If you like bad movies don't watch this, it wont keep your interest. This is such a stupid movie, the ganstas in this movie are so incredibly stupid, the vampires are really lame, I've seen protazoa with better acting skills. I think there was supposed to be 'drama' in this 'film' and I swear, what passes for 'drama' here will either make you fall asleep or spit at the screen for the filmmakers and actors being so stupid. There are worse movies than this - titanic for instance (that movie sucks) - but this still shares the bottom of the pile with all the other mountains of crap that is out there. I hope thats 10 lines.

A bunch of gang-bangers invade a suburban home, where the father has contracted some sorta weirdo cannibal vampire disease. Everyone in the house, and a few others turn into flesh ripping sicko monsters. I was very in between with this film, and I still don't know if I liked it or not. I can say it was at least average. Gore and violence is aplenty in this picture. There are a lot of sick and twisted scenes through out the running time to keep fans of gory horror interested. Some are original. I like gore so I was able to get through it. However, everything in between is very irritating. The characters are all shallow clichés of every stereo-type thats been stuck into a stupid movie like this. And not one character in this is likable or original. Or believable, since the acting was completely low-rank. Plus, this movie is filled with annoying flash-cut scenes and flashbacks that usually take place in complete darkness, which only adds confusion to the story. The setting is boring and the creepy atmosphere that usually adds to a movie like this is non-existent. If the setting was better, or matched the tone of the horror on display here, this could have been better. Still, there is a high level of gruesomeness and a nice portion of T and A (which adds nothing to the story) to make this an okay view. Some scenes are truly sick. Features a father tearing a fetus out of his daughters belly, mother/daughter feeding frenzy on a dismembered body, gut-munching, chopped off heads, torn out hearts, etc., etc. Good gore, bad everything else. Catch it if it's on cable. Two Stars.