Things I like in movie: *That forced kiss scene * Dogs real messy face made it real * Dog attacks looked real * Didn't show cujo's dead bodyLot of things I hate in this movie: * Not impressed with leading lady * Overacting of child was annoying * Cujo's messy face yuckkk * The name Cujo * Dona's strange change in behaviour towards another fellow * No emotional attachment between husband and wife, not even one romantic scene. * 2nd half of the film was so boring. Stuck in car till the end. The end took place after cujo's death so quickly * The biggest drawback, that not even one human could be seen at the place where she stuck with her kid inside the car except for a policeman after 2 days who died in few minutes later. How dafuq is that possible? Come on, that wasn't a jungle. * I actually thought Kujo was the hero and there was another big dangerous dog resides in kid's room under cupboard or basement route. * Kujo by far didn't seem like a venomous dog at many points after he got infected from a bat's bite (really?) * The another guy who had sex with Dona disappeared suddenly after first half part. Many more

Irrespective of the novel - although the novel itself could be identical to the movie - the 1983 adaptation Cujo is the message that openness needs to be condemned. Honesty is a type of pain and suffering. In the most bizarre and unique turn of events, Cujo is a film that's about fairness being the abusive and censorship being the moral factor. A known enemy is the definition of fairness, and the definition of sanity, whilst it's a known ally that's the actual enemy. The equivalent of a known enemy is an unknown ally: the solution, according to the 1983 film Cujo, is that actual fairness is the result of having an ally because of no awareness - having no awareness because of an ally. In general, an ally is a force that's supportive. The lack of awareness makes sense, when it comes to sanity and to establishing fairness, but, the exactness of Cujo is that it's the lack of awareness that makes it possible to have an ally. The lack of force creates support.A force is a concentration. A concentration is always after an origin. The failure to be after an origin creates a support that isn't an oppression. The failure to be after an origin is the same as the success of being before an origin - ergo, the objective of creating an ally which isn't exploitative in any way is predicated on having the ability to precede any origin. An origin is always time, and so, the ensuing logic would have to be that it's only outside of time that pure support is possible. Origin is the ability to precede. Therefore success is when reality overcomes the ability to precede - reality has to defeat the ability to happen before something.Happening before something is the enemy. Happening after something is the ally. The moral reality, is when it's only possible to exist after something else. Being after something is an implied inferiority - the moral reality is when it's only possible to be an implied inferiority. The inferiority is an illusion, as is the implication. The superiority is real, however, it's a superiority that's literally incapable of promoting itself - it's a type of greatness that literally cannot brag about its own power.In Cujo (1983), the concept of being superior is the definition of being a weakness that can take pride in the fact that it's supposed to be a weakness, and therefore understand the idea that literal greatness is a confirmed accident

There is always same kind of feeling about the movies based upon King's novels. They are intriguing, and makes you wonder throughout the entire movie. Also, details of the everyday life, some common aspects our lives were put very will in King's books as well as to movies in a highly creative way that it is highly unlikely to not to surprise even though what you are observing is pretty simple and a familiar occurrence. It's all because of King's imaginative, creative way of thinking solid and simple. You're going to witness here how a peaceful dog turns out to be something else, but the general atmosphere and the harmony of everything is worth your attention.

As usual, when I read a book I like watching the movie adaptation.This one goes back to 1983 and it was very scary, even without the special effects we get these days.Several things were changed from the book, also as usual. Other characters are either omitted after a point or dramatically changed. The story is much more focused on just Donna and Tad and their horrible experience.I definitely gagged quite a few times, what they did to that dog was just gross. The suspense and terror is still all there though, even without the gore. The degradation of the characters as time passes is very well achieved.The entire cast was very good but Tad and Cujo are the definite stars here. In my opinion it is a shame the ending was changed so radically but I suppose this sells better.Cujo is a movie guaranteed to give you nightmares even these days. Don't watch it at night!