The stars both Meg Ryan and Tom Hanks are in the centre of their disguises in this movie with their lives being based here in their work. The story brought together the stars who were like 'debuts' to the screen where in the later decades digital universe with the internet has produced plural movies. Achievement to credit to these two actors and their director is that the crew came together in this movie with lights and space giving time and energy to put the story through processing after shooting and through the final cutting done by the director before the feature film is released. The television broadcast of 'You've Got Mail' had been in the month of July two thousand and eighteen with a suitable romantic visual brocade to broadcast in the television channel at the time. The show that aired as 'You've Got Mail' achieved the expected effect of capturing attention from the other programs who were playing movies simultaneously. The review proofs that even with commercial breaks; like watching movies in cinema halls their was comfort in knowing that eyes watching television programs could be subject to harm like wearing spectacles which we have. Spectacles are objects that give us vision that is like the average eyesight with no spectacles needed to see both far and near distances. Take care to write and read but do not be 'glued' to digital revolution. We were from television sets here in the third world but now the odd movie that catches our attention. Review towards 'Hank Typewriter' which Tom Hanks uses and named after him because he wrote and is an actor in the cinema titled 'You've Got Mail'.

A woman's book store for children is threatened by a big book supermarket which offers greater variety and discounts so she asks for help from her online friend, whom she speaks via mail. She gains his trust and begins fighting for her beloved shop but it's going to be a big struggle which seems to have no hope. To add more pain in the equation, her virtual friend is going to provide a couple of unexpected surprises which she will have to face as life becomes harder and harder. It's a romantic comedy which features a warm but also sad atmosphere in which the main characters face their struggles. It has emotion, drama and happiness but the very predictable and simple finale spoils the overall experience. Still, it's a very good and enjoyable movie to watch with your family.

This is a movie about two people who are having an emotional affair with each other while they are already in relationships with other people. They both know what they are doing is wrong, they wait for their partners to leave before checking their email and sneak around behind their backs. It "all works out in the end" and the partners they were cheating on were not hurt and everyone lived happily ever after. In real life these emotional affairs that start over the internet are extremely hurtful to the other partner, and a movie that romanticizes it is disgusting.It's also shown to be even worse with age. It came out at a time when the Internet was still sort of a new thing, and the idea of meeting people online was weird and shameful. Half my friends who are married met their partners online.The rampant AOL product placement was particularly hilarious considering that company barely even exists anymore except for the 30 senior citizens who think they need to keep paying for it to get email.

(My spoilers are more on the foregone conclusion, 30 second trailer type, by the way)This is one of those movies that you have to see whenever its on. One of those, 'wait let me record this, because I want to catch all the goodness that I feel each time I watch it' flicks. And Nora Ephron is so good at that.Though there are things I'd change. Yes, there are. Let's face it--it's just dated . And I'm not even talking about AOL. I can live with that. But not that Cranberry's song. And the two leads significant others were so annoying and pointless. But it is essentially every Romantic Comedy on earth. They hate each other, there's tension, and in the end they kiss. And maybe I need a few more re-watches but I'm pretty sure Tom Hanks was a prick. But an enjoyable, Tom Hanksy prick. And there's so many good lines and moments in this movie. I enjoy it and I think you will too. I give it a seven because Tom Hanks character was kind of a prick, and it was just not as timeless feeling as I'd like, veering closely to the a cookie cutter RomCom a la Katherine Heigl, for me. I feel this way probably because Meg's character is much more insipid as opposed to past similar roles she's played. But maybe I just need another re-watch...