In this cartoon, carefree baby water nymphs awaken from their slumber in the pond lilies and go about the day with musical activities until nightfall. The cartoon has that refreshing, without-a-care-in-the-world atmosphere, just the type of world I would love to be in. However, the cartoon suffers from a lack of engaging plot and excitement. Not a very entertaining short overall, but it has some nice, morally sound parts to it, like the scene with the babies praying before they sleep.Grade C-

This is a color cartoon in the Silly Symphonies series produced by the Disney studio. There will be mild spoilers ahead:This is a Disney cartoon done in the mid-1930s, so it's essentially a given that it would be visually beautiful. Disney animators had more or less hit their stride by that point, so making a cartoon which had beautiful animation and backgrounds was a cinch.It's also a plot less cartoon for all practical purposes (there are two brief sequences which could almost have been sub-plots, with a few water babies "dressed" as cowboys, with cowboy hats and leaves for chaps and then one water baby being a matador to a charging "bull"frog, with that last one indeed being too cute for words) and it's derivative of bits and pieces of other shorts.Technically, it's an interesting cartoon. But let's face it, this eight minutes of cherubic-looking children swimming and frolicking with birds, frogs fish and insects. It's all a bit too twee for my tastes, even though it's very lovely. A nice cartoon, if not entirely to my taste.This is available on the Disney Treasures Silly Symphonies DVD set and both it and the set are worth finding. Recommended.

Water Babies was such a beautiful and charming silly symphony, that left me speechless. What about the animation? The opening and ending sequences were like the finest watercolour paintings, and everything else is flawlessly done. The music was phenomenal, was the composer listening to Tchaikovsky when he wrote this, because it is very reminiscent of his very lyrical ballet music. The Water Babies were so cute and adorable, and the frogs, birds and swans were also sweet.Forget the fact, it is virtually plot less, and that it bears little resemblance to the classic book by Charles Kingsley(unless it was deliberately detaching itself from the book). See it solely for the animation, characters and music, that way you have a flawless and utterly relaxing gem. 10/10 Bethany Cox

A Walt Disney SILLY SYMPHONY Cartoon Short.The WATER BABIES emerge from their flowery beds to spend another day frolicking with the pond creatures or romping in the forest.There's virtually no plot in this little cartoon, but its action/reaction animation is pleasant enough. Aside from the title, there's no connection with Charles Kingsley's classic book.The babies are all naked (and apparently sexless), thus giving the Disney artists much scope for their favorite bare bottom gags. MERBABIES (1938), a forthcoming Symphony, would bare a striking resemblance to this film.The SILLY SYMPHONIES, which Walt Disney produced for a ten year period beginning in 1929, are among the most fascinating of all animated series. Unlike the Mickey Mouse cartoons in which action was paramount, with the Symphonies the action was made to fit the music. There was little plot in the early Symphonies, which featured lively inanimate objects and anthropomorphic plants & animals, all moving frantically to the soundtrack. Gradually, however, the Symphonies became the school where Walt's animators learned to work with color and began to experiment with plot, characterization & photographic special effects. The pages of Fable & Fairy Tale, Myth & Mother Goose were all mined to provide story lines and even Hollywood's musicals & celebrities were effectively spoofed. It was from this rich soil that Disney's feature-length animation was to spring. In 1939, with SNOW WHITE successfully behind him and PINOCCHIO & FANTASIA on the near horizon, Walt phased out the SILLY SYMPHONIES; they had run their course & served their purpose.