40 years after Arthur Kipps' experience at Eel Marsh house, a group of children under the care of two women, escaping from war-torn London, arrive to the house and become the next target for the ghost of Jennette Humfrye, otherwise known as The Woman in Black. The Woman in Black from 2012 was no art but it was quite of a fun thriller for sure but unfortunately as most sequel to horror movies this one was pretty damn bad and just packed with jump scares, boring characters, awful acting and just a very bad sequel to a really good one. (0/10)

The Woman in Black Angel of Death: Movie Review.The Woman in Black: Angel of Death is an okay type of fair horror movie with some creepy and scary elements. The movie has dark atmospheric tone and vibe and is visually stylish and sharp, but lacks the creepiness of the first part The Woman in Black film, still the movie has some visually dark and creepy sequences. The film lacks intensity and intriguing elements in it story because there is not much story. Main lead characters are dull and boring. The film lacks character development and there is very less feel of tension and scares. The story feels empty and undeveloped. The horror aspect of the movie seems hollow at certain points and has no deep or real impact. All over, its just a below average not so good horror film.(Please Note: That This Review represent only my professional point of view and my personal honest opinion about the film, and does not represent others. Thank You).

Where's the time that Hammer was a standard for creepy flicks or Gothic stories. That's a long time ago. Hammer came back years ago and all geeks were cheering about the fact that they were here to stay, unless, they gave us crap. This isn't crap but it's just on the edge of becoming one. Picking in on the success of Woman In Black (2012) and the comeback of ghost flicks like the Insidious franchise Hammer found it time to make a follow up to the 2012 entry. Can't say that it was badly shot but there wasn't any scary moment to pick up. Oh yeah, when teens would watch it those would scream it aloud. It takes almost over 1 hour and 15 minutes before things really are shown, before that it's the sound that should do it, you know, hearing voices, children singing, the old trick done years ago but here, sadly for me it didn't work at all. Gore 0/5 Nudity 0/5 Effects 2/5 Story 2/5 Comedy 0/5

Where can I begin, on the positive side the acting is good considering the script. This movie is only slightly better than the awful first one. Another movie that tries to go to the limits but gets absolutely nowhere. It's one of those terrible movies when you think "Why did i bother" The story was muddled and weak and I'm sure those actors must have wondered if they were rehearsing for two different movies. Watch this garbage at your peril, it is really dire and not befitting of a Hammer movie.Some of the scenes did not even belong in the storyline, I suppose the old cliché is true that no matter how good the acting is, if its badly produced and directed it just doesn't work.