Honestly this movie is so bad, but it's also good. It's one of those terrible movies that is so bad it's good, if you allow yourself to make fun of this movie as you watch it could be fun. The acting throughout the movie is horrible, if you actually try to look at this movie in a critical way you would probably want to gouge your eyes out five minutes into this movie but if you know as you enter this movie that it is complete garbage and you can prepare yourself to laugh at how bad it is then there will be some enjoyable moments over the course of the this sorry excuse of a movie. Honestly never watch this movie, you will be sorry after you finish it, the few bearable moments of this movie have the same amount of enjoyably of eating a carrot with some spinach dip... like it's not that bad but I would never set myself up with carrots and spinach dip just like I would never set myself up to watch this movie.

It's when it comes to films like this that I really start to question IMDb's rating system. Because how are you really supposed to rate a film? On the plot? The acting? Cinematography? Entertainment value? Because this one has a shitty plot, okay acting, and pretty bad cinematography and special effects. But the overall suckiness makes it very entertaining. Is it thereby worthy of more stars? I think so. The weirdness and lousy effects makes this film really funny, and if watched between 23:00 and 04:00; hilarious. Many quotable scenes that won't make sense to anyone who has not yet seen this masterpiece and many other scenes that are just cringe-worthy and better off forgotten about. Despite of the terrible rating and overall mediocre performance this really is a film worth watching. It shows the diversity in films produced and even if you won't like it it will give you perspective on what is good and what's not and you will be able to appreciate real quality movies even more.

OK so look, The Master of Disguise was not a great film. But it wasn't awful either. If you're a kid then you'll probably like it. But if your an adult and looking for something to laugh hard at, this isn't the film for you. It's simply a different kind of humor.Spaghetti falling on people's heads, slapstick violence, funny voices, it's all young humor. Just accept it for what it is, it's a family/kids movie. But perhaps someone else besides Dana Carvey would have been suitable for the role of Pistachio. Dana Carvey was more into actual real comedies. Maybe Tom Kenny, someone already associated with kids cartoons and movies.THE MASTER OF DISGUISE (2002)

So I saw this film for the first time when I was 8. Of course as an 8 year old, I found this film to be hilarious, but I recall my mother finding it absolutely stupid. I remember every kid in my school was talking about the film and quoting it not long after it came out. Now I have re-watched this film as a young adult, and I'm constantly wondering who was the intended audience for this film? The film is rated PG-13, and it's obvious because some of the humour is inappropriate for children. Ironically, most of the humour in the film would only be funny to someone under the age of 12. Overall, the film basically feels like a watered down, more childish imitation of Austin Powers. I can honestly see why this film has been long forgotten by the majority of the population.