My friend started a Movie Club. On Sundays, one of us posts movie that we all should see during following week and on next Sunday we discuss it and choose next movie. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks is biography drama made for television with Oprah in leading role. Definitely not my cup of tea. But to avoid being party-breaker at the very beginning of the movie club I sat to see it. Honestly, I was bored.During '50s, cells of anonymous Afro-american woman who was dying of cancer made revolutionary breakthrough in medicine. Half century later, journalist Rebecca Skloot decides to write book about HELA cells, Henrietta Lacks, woman whose cells are in question, her life and family. If I understood correctly, this movie is adaptation of that book.Movie follows Rebecca during her research for the book and her relations with Henrietta's children, with lots of flashbacks on this family's past. Past full of drama, emotional trauma and mental illness. But there's almost nothing about HELA cells and their application in modern medicine. Technically speaking movie is solid and I have no objections. Oprah nailed the role of Henrietta's daughter Deborah. But honestly, I do not see the point of making this movie, except to set up a stage for Oprah, who besides leading role is also producer of this film, to show her remarkable acting skills. Biography dramas usually present lives of people whose achievements left mark in history. They bring us closer to their lives and personality and show us how they came to get into history. Henrietta Lacks as person didn't do anything worthy of biography drama. Incidentally, her body produced something that made breakthrough in medicine, but I don't see how it is her merit and what her children and their family drama have to do with HELA cells and research. As family and as individuals these people are completely irrelevant for history and I have no idea why would anybody write about them.6/10

I'm a scientist who had used HeLa cells in my work in the past. I remember that proposal in Science about the cells deserving another species designation--and being dismayed by that myself. And watching the daughter character react to that provided a new perspective for me.The book was very well done and informative. It provided important awareness for those of us in science about the data we are using and about who provided it. Of course, there were many more details that can't be conveyed in a such a short retelling on film, but I thought it captured the key points very well. And it brought the family to vivid reality in a way the book text cannot. I am really glad to have been able to witness the portrayal of their feelings and reactions to this situation. It's a worthwhile film on an important topic that people should see and think about. And you should think about it before you submit your DNA to just any research or company that comes along. There may be times when that's the right thing to do--but do consider the implications.

I liked the idea of the story but it continued into nowheres-ville. Oprah just wanted another big part and she is the executive producer so most of the show is hers. It should b more of Rose Byrne's, the writer of the book about Henrietta Lacks. Not worth your time or efforts to absorb this lousy film.

I read the book years ago and thought it was terrific. I was very excited to hear that it was going to be made into a movie and waited a long time for its fruition. What a disappointment! I watched it to the end, but honestly, almost turned it off several times. It was nothing like the book as I remember it. I wish I could un-watch this and get the 1 hour,35 minutes I spent watching it back.