Like i wrote on my review in the first movie, i have a guilty pleasure with shocking and disturbing content, and the first one was underwhelming in that department, but after watching the second one, it was everything i expected from the 1st one. not only was the gore and violence brought to the next level, but the portrayal of Martin done by Lawrence R. Harvey was (in my opinion) phenomenal, i'm in no way saying that the role was acted better than all other roles played by other actors, i'm saying that he played this role perfectly, to the point where while i was watching the movie, i felt bad for his character (even with all the horrible things he did). for the people who like being shocked for the sake of being shocked, watch this movie, for the people who can look past shocking stuff and enjoy seeing a great portrayal of an insane man, watch it.

What on earth was this supposed to represent?!Movies are supposed to provoke emotion in a creative manner and present an artistic plot easy to understand. Comprehending the plot wasn't the problem, and the only emotion I felt through the entire feature was DISGUST! If the movie wouldn't scare and revolt you with one plot point, it would follow up with something much worse. The performance from the main character was good regardless of lack of dialogue....but why the actor Lawrence R. Harvey or indeed Ashlynn Yennie from the movie's first installment would want to take part in this horrid feature film 'art' is anyone's guess. Performances can't even save my 1-star review of this abomination.

"The Human Centipede" is really more of a social experiment rather than an actual film franchise. I mean, why are we so keen on seeing something we know is going to be vile and disturbing? Why did I personally see all these movies, even though they always fill me with disgust and shame (see also: "Police Academy")? I'll probably never get it, but with that said: the second one is clearly the best of this epic trilogy. The first one does virtually nothing with its unique premise, the third one is essentially one long in-joke...but this one actually seems close to what director Tom Six was trying to do all along: entertaining an audience through nausea. This is mainly because of new lead Lawrence Harvey, who genuinely puts in a great performance and is just incredibly unpleasant to look at. Dieter Laser looked creepy as well in the first one, but he performed like he could barely remember his lines (which makes sense, because the man barely speaks English). Harvey doesn't have any lines, so that's an improvement I guess. Martin is actually a compelling character, which I thought was far beyond Six' capabilities. If you have to watch a "Human Centipede"-entry make it this one, because the franchise won't get any better than this. Which is kind of depressing, but that's the effect these movies have.

without a doubt the most tasteless and disgusting film I've ever seen. The first movie at least a semblance of a plot but this crude and nasty "movie" has no plot-it's nothing short of torture porn. The first 30 minutes or so passable but the last third was just revolting. There is no motive other than to show people suffering and being mutilated. I couldn't even watch most of it. Why are people so desperate to work in a movie that they would subject themselves to such degradation? As an actor, there i no amount of money or notoriety that would convince me to do something so horrendous. It's just sick for the sake of being sick. It doesn't even make sense. Martin works in a parking garage to find victims yet no one ever notices his actions or him coming to work covered in blood. Sick, vile and disgusting. The first movie is Citizen Kane compared to this garbage. Tom Six should NEVER be allowed near a computer, a camera or any amount of cash EVER. I would give this minus 10 if allowed.