I will attempt to review the vomit gore trilogy as a whole and save myself and everyone time.We must look at Lucifer valentines facade. In interviews he always goes on about how he was in a sexual relationship with his younger sister which he raised single handedly. She was a BLIND catatonic schizophrenic. this diagnosis doesn't even exists as it is now labelled as dissociative identity disorder.keep in mind more than half of clinical psychiatrist agree this disease is 100% caused by childhood trauma meaning it has 0 chances of being biological. considering this, how can Lucifer say she drowned herself in the bathtub after recreating a scene from SVD. this is obscured? does anyone see the problem with his statement yet?? how about now? how does a blind girl recreate something she SAW in a film. his girlfriends quote above is i would die for you, i would even kill for you.see where i am heading with this.something is seriously wrong with this account of his sisters demise. this pompous d*ck has the nerve to say his movies reflect quantum theory and higher levels of the human organism and consciousness. I'm sorry but saying i got abducted in 1973 and repeating this phrase 30 times while changing the date does not in anyway relate to quantum mechanics or the spiritual realm.how about the octopus on head scene in RGS.I think it went like this in real life. oh damn we forgot to use an octopus in the intestine puke scene. what do we do. LV chugs beers as he ponders. sets beer bottle on table put the octopus on his head walks in front of camera and shoves finger in mouth then pukes! *recycle*yeah the fx's are so bad you can tell the girls intestine is an octopus.i guess he never heard of using pig intestines.his drawings look like a 12 year old.he is too afraid to stand in public which makes me wonder if he is even a real person.i must admit the film is disturbing due to it being a scat film. for a horror movie it is very depraved and demented. you can't compare it to real scat films and say they are more disturbing because they are in a different spectrum of film. i hate the non stop cutting of film which actually makes the film less shocking. scenes are so fast you never really have time to absorb how messed up they are. again another attempt at being non linear or quantum theory w.e....just watch the non linear film waking life. This is a surrealist movie about the human condition in altered states and references quantum theory. as for his satanic title. please ...... anyone who knows anything about satanism knows its church only accepts the rich and powerful. They teach to destroy psychic vampires that drain your energy. so broken souls and schizophrenic sisters would be killed in a true satanic family.this guy is a joke. if he was to write a book it would only be pictures. i don't know which is easier to attack the films or the man behind them. i tend to think they are one of the same. a total fraud.i know you killed her! keep listening to burzum you Nazi!!! and stop connecting yourself to sun o))). fake intellectualism really makes me angry I'm sorry people.still BLIND people who can see.. This is a new one. There is a mystery to be unlocked here, possible more disturbing then the films themselves.

I can give this movie credit for one thing: At least it fits its title.This is the entire movie: Kill somebody, people vomit for 20 minutes, then a meth addict strips while we continue to see the after shot of a "Faces of Meth" poster. Repeat for 71 minutes.Really? How can one even call this a movie? It's just random, badly edited shots of murder and vomit. And the decision to use a pitch shifter effect on all the dialogue just makes all these vomiting women sound like men was a poor one. The synopsis says "A girl makes a deal with the devil to get revenge on her tormentors" (paraphrased). Without that I would have been totally lost as to whatever was going on in this movie.This gets a 1/10 if only because negative numbers are simply imaginary, but it's still a better imagination than whoever thought up this filth.

I have waited to watch the Lucifer flicks until the trilogy was out. Due only one, his first, flick appears on IMDb I will review the trilogy here. The first one is Slaughtered Vomit Dolls. It's the worst part of the trilogy but still it's graphic. There is a lot of nudity and some gore appears on the screen but it's not that you can't take it. A lot of vomit is going on, a bit too much here to really say it's a good flick. The movie is watchable due the editing and the weird sounds used. Being myself into the Gothic scene I heard it all before so for me it wasn't that strange at all. SVD is more about the nudity without really extreme violence. Part 2, Regoregitated Sacrifice is something completely different. I have the extreme limited edition signed by Lucifer. Here I can imagine that some people are thinking that they are watching a snuff. The violence is well done and the gore is as graphic and disgusting as it can be. There is more nudity and even that is shown in a more explicit way. Pussies are all over the screen. Of course vomit takes a main part in it but this was for me the best of the trilogy. If you are not into explicit gore or into extreme sex than you better not watch this. Girls are licking each other, cutting each other with knifes and drinking their blood, pissing in glasses and drink it. The goriest part is the decapitation of a 18 year old whore, putting a spider into a vagina and sewing it. Part 3, Slow Tortured Puke Chamber takes it a bit further. The gore is a bit over the top and it becomes a bit laughable. The fetus scene is what I refer to. But it's the girls and what they do that will sicken most of the viewers. A cross with Jesus on it goes into vagina's and they start masturbating with it. Then they go vomiting on the cross. Pissing in mouths, drinking it, really, this is surely not for the squeamish. Again, it's really hard to get official copies of this trilogy. It's been re-issued on Unearthed label but you know, after a while those will also become pricey.Gore 3/5 Nudity 3,5/5 Effects 2/5 Story 1/5 Comedy 0/5

I find myself returning to watch this movie at least once a year. Having watched AntiChrist by Lars Von Trier when it came out, I think I understand why. Much was made, in the reviewing of AntiChrist, of Charlotte Gainsbourgs performance. Her bravery. Her choice to display an extreme level of intimacy on screen. I would submit that the performance of the lead actress and the construction of the main character in Slaughtered Vomit Dolls surpass Charlotte Gainsbourg in AntiChrist. Furthermore without the pretentious baggage of LVTs direction what is left here is closer to reality, and as such has a greater impact.I'll get the obvious stuff aside next. The gore. Vomit. Decapitations. Strangulations. Are nothing new. Nothing you cant see in many other places. Swallowing your own vomit? Hell, they do that on practically every episode of Jackass and Dirty Sanchez. Brains, eyes, decapitations, and the rest, even more common, everything from Saw and Red Dragon to Evil Dead. Even if done well it offers nothing new, nothing to be offended by or interested in. This sort of gore stripped of context means nothing anymore.Here the gore works to satisfy the genre and supply the setting for Angela Aberdeens psyche. The highly repetitious scenes of gore are the weakest if viewed flat, but if you watch the movie with a bit of a buzz on, they make more sense. In this state they are used to induce in you a similar mental landscape to that of the main character, partly through the spectacle but mostly through the inescapable mind numbing repetition. Through these waves of blood gore and vomit, the movie produces a clean white knight sympathy for Angela. Demanding a hero to pull her out, and supplying non.The simple plot is beside the point. This movie, I believe, is intended to be more of a roller-coaster ride. To try and get you into Angela Aberdeens head in her last hours. Make you feel her pain and understand her past and what would be her unchanging future. As such this is a very brave movie. Bravery that has been vindicated by the experience you should have if you enter this with an open mind, and are not looking for a simple gore fest.A movie I will watch again in a year or so. No doubt.