Though I've seen the suspenser before, I still had a sweat bucket handy for this latest go-round. Great job all-around. It's the kind of B-movie old movie fans savor, that is, if you don't mind your knuckles turning white. Talman delivers a career performance as the psychotic hitchhiker Emmett Myers. He'd just as soon shoot you as shake your hand. So who do you suppose average guys Lovejoy and O'Brien give a ride to.That's it, the whole story--- two nice guys at the mercy of an escaped lunatic with neither a tree nor a girl in sight. But the suspense seldom lets up. Sure, a critical eye could wonder why the two hostages don't try to turn the tables more than they do. Wisely, however, the script suggests that neither wants to endanger the other with a false move. Besides, Talman's one scary dude. Producer Lupino better have three of the industry's best actors because their interaction's the whole story. Fortunately she got them. Two inspired touches-having Myers (Talman) unable to close one eye gives him a subtly gruesome appearance, plus filming in a hellish desert perfectly mirrors the situation. The lonely traveling car is like a one-way trip to Hades. I doubt that any film has gotten more out of a dollar-eighty budget than this little suspense gem. I love it when a cheap-jack production like this delivers more goods than the Technicolor biggies of the day. Thanks be to the versatile Ida Lupino and her company of three outsized talents for this minor triumph.

They say that no good deed goes unpunished, and friends Roy Collins and Gilbert Bowen find out the truth of this saying when, during a fishing trip to Mexico, they pick up a hitchhiker whose car has apparently run out of gas. The man, Emmett Myers, turns out to be a murderer on the run from the American authorities who has managed to slip into Mexico. Myers draws a gun on the men and forces them to drive him to where he wants to go, threatening to kill them after they have taken him to his destination, the town of Santa Rosalía in Baja California. (Myers is based upon a real-life serial killer, Billy Cook, although the number of killings committed by Cook had to be reduced in the film at the insistence of the Hays Office)."The Hitch-Hiker" is a suspense thriller made in 1953, but in many ways it is very different from the work of Alfred Hitchcock, America's most famous director of suspense thrillers during the fifties. At only seventy minutes long it is considerably shorter than most of Hitchcock's films. There is no trademark blonde heroine. (Indeed, although the film was directed by a female director, Ida Lupino, there are no prominent female characters at all). There is no comic relief. Lupino does not attempt to analyse the psychology behind Myers' crimes as Hitchcock does with Norman Bates in "Psycho" and some of his other villains; Myers is simply a psychopath, and that is that. There are no cliff-hangers on a prominent building and no directorial set-pieces comparable to the "Psycho" shower scene.William Talman, best remembered as the District Attorney in the "Perry Mason" TV serial, is normally thought of as a supporting actor, but here he dominates the film with his performance as the malevolent Myers. It quickly becomes obvious that he does not regard Roy, Gil and their car merely as a convenient means of transport to facilitate his escape. It is quite clear that he takes a positive, lip-smacking sadistic pleasure in tormenting them both physically and psychologically. Indeed, it may be this very sadism to which the two men owe their survival; logically it would have made more sense, from Myers' point of view, to have killed them early on and then driven off in the car himself, thus eliminating two witnesses, but had he done so he would have been left without victims to torture. What Myers cannot understand is the mutual friendship and loyalty which prevents both Roy and Gil from attempting to escape separately; altruism of any sort is quite alien to his nature.The film is often categorised as film noir, but in many ways it is also different from most mainstream noir. Some films noirs, "The Big Sleep" being a good example, had notoriously complex plots, but that of "The Hitch-Hiker" is simplicity itself. There are no sub-plots; Lupino concentrates on the main story, the plight of Roy and Gil and their efforts to escape from the ever-present menace of the watchful Myers. It is not set on the mean streets of an American city or in seedy, claustrophobic interiors but in the wide-open spaces of the Mexican desert, and the barrenness and loneliness of this landscape becomes a symbol of the threat hanging over the two heroes. I said above that the film does not contain any Hitchcockian set-pieces, which normally mark a notable increase in the level of tension. Here the tension is maintained at a high level throughout; perhaps the entire film can be seen as one long, extended seventy minute set-piece. An excellent thriller. 8/10

Two fishing buddies unwittingly give a lift to a serial killer who forces them to drive across the border at gunpoint in this compact thriller directed by Ida Lupino. A former film noir star, Lupino brings several interesting directing touches to the film such as the initial obscuring of the hitchhiker's face until he produces his gun, but it is William Talman's unhinged performance as the hitcher that really makes the film. He has a creepy calmness to him as he holds the two men hostage like something that he has done millions of times before, and his face more than his gun oozes menace. Edmond O'Brien and Frank Lovejoy are, on the other hand, dull as his two victims; the film momentarily brings up something about them lying to their wives about their trip, but the most part, their function in the script is simply to (unsuccessfully) attempt to escape and evade again and again. The film grows a tad repetitive as it goes on, and with constant cutaways to the US and Mexican police investigating the matter, it never really maintains any tension that it builds. The film is also a less thrilling experience since we constantly know that the police are on top of things and have a plan of what to do, and the despair of the fishing buddies never really resonates since the movie provides a strong sense that everything will work out. Still, the film is certainly worth a look for Talman's performance. His big screen career was curiously short, spending most of his years in television; one can only wonder what may have been had 'The Hitch-Hiker' been more widely seen in its day.

This movie opens up with "This is the true story of a man and a gun and a car. The gun belonged to the man. The car might have been yours _ or that young couple across the aisle ... For the facts are actual." It reminds me of those industrial educational film played for high school students warning them of drunken driving or smoking weed. Roy Collins (Edmond O'Brien) and Gilbert Bowen (Frank Lovejoy) are driving off to have a good time away from the kids. They pick up psycho hitchhiker killer Emmett Myers (William Talman) who pulls out a gun. He forces them to drive.This is a strip down 71 minutes movie. Talman is over the top creepy with the wonky eye. It's the expected look of a psycho killer at the time. I didn't find it compelling. And I can't figure out why he kept both men. On the surface, there are a lot of compelling facts about this production. The dark subject matter puts it away from the big studios and solidly into the indie B-movie camp. The fact that director Ida Lupino is a woman makes this one of a short list. It also allowed her to work with blacklisted writer Daniel Mainwaring. However I didn't find neither the victims nor the killer that compelling. The movie just felt like dragging from one scene to the next. I find myself liking the production artwork a lot more than the movie.