If you have seen the original 1933 version of the Good Companions then you will understand why I say that this is a vastly inferior remake.True it is in colour,but if anything it detracts rather than adds to the film.In any event by the time this film was$ made concert parties had virtually died out.The two leads are very poor.Jeanette Scott cannot sing or dance which makes her appearance rather pointless.John Fraser is an inadequate leading man.The film differs from the original in a number of ways,all to its own disadvantage.There is the tacked on show at the end which is truly dreadful and represents all that is worst in fifties British musicals.So not surprising that in the final credits it is the dancers who take the top credits.Definitely not one of Associated British Pictures better efforts

In some aspects The Good Companions formed the basis of J.B. Priestly's pension pot given the number of outings it has enjoyed on the large and small screen since the first adaption in 1933. For me the drawing card for this, 1957, version was Celia Johnson as Miss Trant, the spinster who saves the Concert Party dying on its feet in their initial encounter and turns it around. On paper this story is the personification of simplistic as Priestly contrives to have three disparate people, a down-to-earth Yorkshire factory worker with a nagging wife, just rendered jobless even as an upper-class schoolteacher finds himself in the same boat, and the aforesaid spinster who realises simultaneously that life is for living, come together and collide with the Concert Party whose manager has just eloped with the takings and left them stranded. A plot as flimsy as this requires deft performances and here Eric Portman as the bluff Yorkshireman and Celia Johnson as the Home Counties lady of leisure are a delight. Janette Scott as the ingenue Susie Dean shares the screen if no actual scenes with real-life mother Thora Hird, as the nagging wife and Paddy Roberts, very much in vogue at the time, performing his own lyrics, provides a half-decent score. Worth a look.

Well, the star of this film from start to finish was 18 year old Janette Scott of "The Day of the Triffids" fame. It was also a pleasant surprise to see Celia Johnson some 12 years later from the classic film "Brief Encounter", and looking very good indeed. She brings the same understated charm to this part as she did to that one. You genuinely feel the admiration between her and the character Jess Oakroyd. Janette Scott brings her all to this part; dancing a few simply numbers very nicely and lip syncing with aplomb. She does lack the gravity of a superstar, but this part is perfect for her as the up-and-comer. The movie does quite a good job of covering what in novel form is some 640 pages. Of course the movie can't compete with the book in its detail, but it does nicely cover the story line and give each character a chance to shine, and it does manage to capture that "good companion" atmosphere by casting good character actors who are obviously having a good time making the film. All in all much fun and many musical stage numbers. The ones at the end of the film were even good enough to remind me of similar numbers in the movie "Funny Face". Don't miss this one if you have a chance.

I considered "The Good Companions" simply made and entertaining, as was the novel. The actors were well cast and each played their part to perfection. It was unusual for a British studio to 'try' a musical at that period of time, and I think it came off pretty well. For me it is an unexpected, delightful offering such as "Curtain Up".