The Descent: Part 2
The Descent: Part 2
R | 27 April 2010 (USA)
The Descent: Part 2 Trailers

Distraught, confused, and half-wild with fear, Sarah Carter emerges alone from the Appalachian cave system where she encountered unspeakable terrors. Unable to plausibly explain to the authorities what happened - or why she's covered in her friends' blood - Sarah is forced back to the subterranean depths to help locate her five missing companions.

Reviews
torstensonjohn

Picking up where the first film left off, Sarah is covered in blood and tracks down a vehicle on the road. As the women are reported missing the sheriff decides to re-enlist Sarah's help and take a cave dwelling team down. The cinematography of the cave sequences is very telling. The creatures are virtually creepy as hell and very well done makeup wise. A couple faults is the grotesque scenes of blood imagery are way off, blood does not look real. The dialogue is basic and story is flat, but the ending leaves the door open for a third installment.

... View More
benghostfreek

The monsters themselves are kind of scary and cool but the claustrophobic feeling of it all is what really freaks me out

... View More
jenniacochran

******Spoilers below*******The only thing that wasn't realistic in this entire cave creature movie was that old hillbilly driving the tow truck. So Sarah runs to him in the road and he stopped for her and brought her to the police/hospital yet when he sees the deputy he pushes her back into the cave hole to feed the creatures? WTF? Why not just kill sarah too or bring her back to the hole?

... View More
sukanya-samy

Ya I know, I am one of those who watches movies back to back. And I am going to keep this one very short.After my pleasant (nothing pleasant about it) viewing of Descent, I watched the sequel. For people who are interested, Descent released in 2005 had 2 different endings, both quite plausible and one of them which would have shut the chapter for a sequel. But they chose the ending which opened the doors for a sequel when it wasn't required.The movie opens just 2 days after the 6 women go missing and shows the sheriff and cave explorers trying to figure out where they were. In a parallel scene, Sarah who escaped gets saved and ends up in a hospital. The movie then continues to show the stupid sheriff, about 3 explorers and Sarah back again in the same cave system from which Sarah escaped. Now if you have gone through a traumatic experience, why would you force a survivor to face the same circumstances again and if you are the survivor, why would you go into the claustrophobic setting again? I just couldn't understand it.The movie then just goes from bad to worse with the same kind of scenes, jumps and gore which wasn't even required. Sarah played by Shauna Macdonald tries her best to save the movie but is left unsupported by the stupidity of the plot and irrational sequence of events.Some movies just don't need a sequence (even if they made tonnes of money to begin with). I give this a 'C-'.

... View More