Superman IV: The Quest for Peace
Superman IV: The Quest for Peace
PG | 24 July 1987 (USA)
Superman IV: The Quest for Peace Trailers

With global superpowers engaged in an increasingly hostile arms race, Superman leads a crusade to rid the world of nuclear weapons. But Lex Luthor, recently sprung from jail, is declaring war on the Man of Steel and his quest to save the planet. Using a strand of Superman's hair, Luthor synthesizes a powerful ally known as Nuclear Man and ignites an epic battle spanning Earth and space.

Reviews
tomr-28618

Easily one of the worst superhero movies and just one of the worst movies in general.This movie is hilariously bad. The effects look truly awful, the action scenes are funny and very silly, the story revolving around nuclear man was just stupid and again, funny. Somehow this movie has worse visual effects than the first even though it came out 9 years after.This film is watchable unlike some bad super hero movies because of how funny and stupid it is but it's truly a complete mess of a film and cannot be taken even the slightest bit seriously.

... View More
MovieBuffMarine

It was nice seeing most of the original cast (from 1978) reprise their roles: Gene Hackman - Lex Luthor; Jackie Cooper - Perry White; Marc McClure - Jimmy Olsen; Margot Kidder - Lois Lane; and of course Christopher Reeve - Superman. This was to be their final outings in their respective roles in this iteration of Superman.Unfortunately, their presence alone was not enough to boost this movie both in story and at the box office. The Salkinds were no longer in charge. Instead, Golan-Globus and the Cannon Group were brought on to get this off the ground.The premise of this movie was a worthy one for our beloved hero: Superman wants to rid the world of nukes and his traditional arch-nemesis Lex Luthor had other plans to prevent that. Unfortunately, the Cannon Group and their writers couldn't make it interesting enough to draw audiences.While I enjoyed many of the flicks put on by the (now defunct) Cannon Group, it was apparent that superheroes and the Superman franchise were not their forte'. "Low budget" doesn't always equal low quality, but for this movie, unfortunately, the results were less-than-stellar.From what I gather, the Cannon Group was already in financial trouble when they took on the reins of the Superman series. This was a chance for them to start the road to recovery and make up for Superman III's dismal performance. They failed. Cannon continued their downward spiral and Superman IV did much worse than III.This was truly the end of the an era for Christopher Reeve's iteration of Superman, his fellow players who started in it and the original production company. While it was inevitable that the players for this iteration would no longer be playing those roles (as the years went by), it was sad to see their finale in these roles in this less- than-desirable chapter.

... View More
Maddie

This movie makes me despise movies in general.This movie was made by a production company called Canon. They made terrible movies. (That's probably why they went out of business.) This movie lost the whole point of making a movie, it was just so confusing, losing plot points and characters, and all of the scenes in space made no sense. All of them! And the fight scenes in space look like two men in costumes having a wrestling match while floating in a void. And I won't even mention the fact about Superman's cape fluttering in space.This just wasn't a well thought out movie. It was like they were given a hundred dollars and told to make a movie. The green screen scenes were crap, and all of the flying scenes looked practically the same, because they were practically all the same! The people who made the movie were too lazy to make more than one flying scene, I am guessing. Or the production was being rushed.It seems that Lois Lane can defy gravity in this movie. Superman let go of her in one of the most terrible scenes-and she kept flying beside him. Unless she is an alien, like him.If IMDb had an official worst movies ever list- this should be number one.

... View More
MartinHafer

"Superman IV: Quest for Peace" should have been renamed "Superman IV: Quest for a Plot" as the film's script is pure garbage...full of schmaltz, preachiness and so many things that simply are dumb and make little sense. It's also a film that clearly shows the limits of special effects, as even with 1980s technology the film should have looked so much better--especially since it's about the most effects-laden Superman film up to that time.The story is full of saccharine when the entire planet stops to take notice of some little boy who writes to Superman to request that he bring about world peace! Superman, never wanting to disappoint any child, responds by destroying the world's nuclear stockpile. However, Lex Luthor disguises one of the nuclear missiles as just a garden variety nuclear bomb when really it's infused with some Superman DNA. So, when the missile is tossed into the sun, it naturally produces an evil Krytonian who is bent on killing Superman and working for Luthor. Can our incredibly plastic hero destroy this evil menace AND balance two women...one who is beautiful and loves Clark and another who's an idiot who STILL can't understand that Clark and Superman are the same freaking guy!!While the story is saccharine and stupid and the special effects quite bad, the film team do manage to also make the acting terrible- -even by Superman standards. The standout in this department is Jon Cryer-- who really can act. But given the bilge the writers (a room full of baboons, I think), he comes off as simply annoying and hateful. The rest, by the way, aren't much better.So do I recommend this film? Yes and no. No if you want to see a decent film. Yes if you are either using it to torture someone or if you are a glutton for punishment, like me, and occasionally enjoy laughing at Hollywood stars destroying themselves. A little schadenfreude is what's needed to enjoy this picture, that's for sure.

... View More