Story plot was okay, but so badly carried out that the movie was boring. This entire series is badly made. The garbage acting was shocking and revolting. One can forgive the small children who could not act well, but the mother in particular being hired as an actress at all is a shock. The absence of proper acting was so revolting that this movie was very difficult and frustrating to get through. One could not even tell if the parents, particularly the mother, were happy or scared about any situation, such was the lack of expression. The voice dubbing of the bird was also extremely fake and annoying. The depth of emotions was absent, again, owing to the fake and rubbish acting. The story could have been nicer if these elements were fixed. Other than that, the idea of a mouse brother in a 'loving family' is a good one. Its execution was severely poor, however. The first movie was somewhat better than this one, but the third one being a low-quality animation is disappointing.

not profound different by first part, it has a special virtue - it is a film for kids. naive, not very complicated, nice and full of basic romanticism and heroism. so, for adult public it could be a disappointment. but to be the kind of movie for a specific viewer is the vocation of this type of films. to use the child sensitivity, to preserve the fairy tale's spirit, to explore the adventure rules, to be charming and sweet and colored. so, for its purpose, the second Stuart Little represents the best result. and that is the secret to see it. to ignore the first expectations. for enjoy. and for remind the genuine seduction of a small story.

This film is about a domesticated mouse that having a big adventure when he saves a chicken that is preyed upon by an bad vulture."Stuart Little 2" has a good plot, as it celebrates love, courage and freedom. How the Little family care for each other is portrayed well, creating the atmosphere of love and warmth in a family. It sends a positive and uplifting message to viewers. The adventures of Stuart Little is also thrilling. Even though I knew nothing bad will happen in the end because it is a children's film, the above elements kept me interested throughout. "Stuart Little 2" is a good film for a family to enjoy together.

Usually sequels don't surpass their predecessors in terms of quality, but Stuart Little 2 is such a charming film, that it is hard not to like it. It is a little predictable at times, but that's my only real complaint of this movie. Stuart makes friends with Margalo, voiced with real innocence by Melanie Griffith, and it is this that makes the film so charming. Little does he know she is in league with a falcon, voiced with seedy villainy by James Woods, very like Hades in Hercules. Michael J.Fox still delights as the voice of Stuart, but it is Nathan Lane as Snowbell who has the best lines, they were that funny. Other funny lines were those such as "Flying in the House?" as the look on Hugh Laurie's face was priceless. The film is sprinkled with lovely messages, that never preaches and kids take to them like a pinch of salt. The script is more subdued than its predecessor but still delivers as effectively. The chase scenes are memorable and never slow the film down. All in all, an exceedingly charming sequel, with an 8/10. Bethany Cox.