Remarkably boring. This film thinks you have the intelligence of a gnat and proceeds accordingly. A color by numbers plot that a film student would receive a failing grade.

7/10? Are you having a laugh? Listen, I love my star trek. I really enjoyed the first reboot and I thought the second one wasn't bad for a sequel. This film; however, was bad. It's cheesy, predictable and has a tick box of categories. It's just badly written and has an awful 'bad guy'. Definitely the worst of the reboots.

As many poor reviews as I've seen on this site and others, it's clear this film is far more for a newer younger audience, meaning viewers, who weren't old enough to the franchises from the mid 90's. As I've noticed over the years with the newer Star Wars movies beginning with The Force Awakens. Fans simply don't like change or evolution older characters. Abrams has Taken Star Trek in a direction which appeals to younger viewers and not the Trekkers who were around for TNG and the other shows. He's had to make them full of action and violence so the film will bring in more money on opening weekend. Not saying I'm a fan, but we have to face reality and concede, this ain't Gene Roddenberry's Star Trek.

This is one of the worst Star Trek movies I've seen. And I am including all the first ones with Shatner and Nemoy. The whole story line was wrong, and quite honestly didn't have J.J's magic touch. Sorry guys, but although the acting was again to character and interesting, the script and direction was not up to par, and I can't see this genre going further unless JJ takes over the whole management.I agree whole heartedly with aiqbal66, and the general story theme was wrong. Star Trek pursues scientific themes and metaphors that keep the audience enthralled and thinking. This movie did not do that. I gave it a six but the cinematography and sound was good. If I had been meaner I think a 4 was adequate. Just did not reach expectations that the first two movies got, and most disappointing.