A few nights ago I watched SABOTEUR directed by Alfred Hitchcock. When it was over, I watched a DVR recording of this film by Anthony Mann. What do both these titles have in common? Robert Cummings, of course.It occurs to me while watching REIGN OF TERROR just how expressive Cummings and his face are. Watch him in a scene without the sound, and you will see what I am saying. There are so many moods and so many bursts of energy that flash across his countenance as he delivers dialogue or handles bits of stage direction. Maybe this is because he is just one of those actors naturally at ease in front of the camera regardless of the role he's playing. And maybe it helps that he is working with good directors. Still, the expressions are genuine and not gimmicky. Those windows into what he's feeling and experiencing, they are completely real. His close-ups are intensely personal. Especially when he is conveying awe. Or terror.

Robert Cummings, Richard Basehart, Arlene Dahl, and Norman Lloyd star in this excellent little tense thriller set during the French Revolution. I went into this knowing nothing, and really the viewer doesn't need to know anything. If you love fast-paced espionage films, this is the one to see. With great production values supervised by director Anthony Mann, this has to be one of the best movies made in 1949, even though it's been forgotten in the years since. Robert Cummings is looking for a certain book, obviously, to bring down Richard Basehart, who's in power and control over the people. And, Arlene Dahl has never looked lovelier. One of the film's best attributes is in creating the mood and moment as it heightens the tension, while the law is looking for Bob and Arlene at an old farmhouse and the quiet scenes are very memorable and tense. From there on, the film is on another plane entirely and is better than one would expect from such a little film. If you've never seen this, you're missing one of the best films to come from director Anthony Mann.

The first question I have to ask is why would Maximilien Robespierre, who generally was a pretty smart guy until he overreached, keep a written record of the people he's earmarking for denunciation and death. That's the sort of thing you'd think he'd have just in his head. But he's got it, people know he has it and unfortunately for Richard Basehart the wrong people know he has it.Which brings me to the plot of the story of Reign Of Terror. The famous Marquis De Lafayette who was in exile at that point has sent an agent in the person of Robert Cummings to find the book and expose Robespierre's plans to eliminate possible opponents. The beautiful Arlene Dahl is working for another member of the National Assembly with similar aims and they join forces.If Reign Of Terror had been done at a major studio like MGM or Paramount we might have seen a full blown color production. As it was this film was done at the short lived Eagle-Lion Studios and it was mostly filmed in shadows to disguise the cheapness of the sets. In doing that it gives Reign Of Terror a noir like quality that is the second most effective thing in the film. The atmosphere is one like a Universal Gothic horror film.But the best thing about the film is the way Richard Basehart captures the character of the cold, bloodless, and merciless Robespierre. Robespierre was a man who disdained the pleasures of the flesh and the world had recently been dealing with another fanatic named Hitler who was the same way.If you discount the silliness of Robespierre actually keeping a written list somewhere, Reign Of Terror despite its cheap production values, does effectively capture the mood of France in the middle 1790s. And Basehart is brilliant in his role.

This film, beautifully wrought (cinematographer John Alton must be responsible for much of this), makes me long to return to the days of black and white films and the stunning art that can be made in shades of gray.From the first shot of a tiny distant rider silhouetted against massive lowering storm clouds, we are pulled into the mood of the film. The smallness of the rider is the smallness of the protagonist in the face of the overpowering events of the French Revolution. The use of light and shadow, the low shots and unusual closeups of actors: all of this made me feel I was in the hands of a master of his art. My breath was literally taken away by many of these images.The story is serviceable and the acting quite good, but what sticks with me is the imagery of the film, the beauty of it.