Agreed. The first two were the best!! This one on the other hand, it was fine. Love the acting and the setting taking place in the old west, but it wasn't as strong. I agree it is amazing, but I think the first were the stronger films. I'd still see it.

Movie Review: "Back To The Furture Part III" (1990)Oh, it is getting hard for this back-to-back shot in "Hollywood season 1988/1989 by capable to excellent cinematographer Dean Cundey into an second sequel of a 1985 U.S. summer smash hit at the movies executive produced to majesty by Steven Spielbergs production company exclusively at Universal Studios "Amblin Entertainment", when already legendary leading character of Martin "McFly", portrayed with wit, joy and screwball-speed by Michael J. Fox, delivers 1960s "Clint Eastwood" western homages for the masses within precision directions by director Robert Zemeckis, where pub brawls, duel shot-outs to the climaxing "unstoppable" train chase; and no sequence fails to build a round-up finish for a Hollywood "Trilogy" never to be touched in prequel, sequel or spin-off motions again by any bidding "Major Studio"; just a full-circle, full-body "McFly" character showcase well done for the whole family to witness over and over on any digital exhibition device. Copyright 2018 Cinemajesty Entertainments LLC

And with this film we ended the most entertaining trilogy movie , Back to the Future III now goes on in the old west, the picture is excellent, the Visual best is very good, Michael J.Fox and Christopher Lloyd is the last time Marty McFly character is Dr Emmett Brown , the film is a lot of fun once again the story is great, It is not better than the first (because it is also insuperable ) , but it is as good and fun as the second the scene of him running away from the Indians is very cool, Back to the Future is the last of this great trilogy, maybe one day they not announce the four with the return of Michael J. Fox and Christopher Lloyd for another great adventure . Note 7.8

I'm a huge fan of the Back to the Future series. In particular, the first two. Back to the Future Part 3 isn't bad, but it's true it's not anywhere near as good as the first. In true Back to the Future Fashion, it starts just as the last left off. In 1955, after preventing a time-line where Biff Tannen (Thomas F Wilson) becomes a corrupt casino owner, Marty McFly (Michael J Fox), witnesses his friend Dr. Emmett Brown (Christopher Lloyd) get struck by lightning in the DeLorean DMC time machine, and sent back to 1885. After re-meeting 1955 Emmett (who had just helped the Marty of the first film get back to 1985), Marty goes to 1885, to bring home Emmett and prevent him from being killed by Biff's great grandfather Buford Tannen (Wilson). It's not as good as the first two, because it's not as funny or endearing as those ones. It is kind of a basic story. There's still a lot going on, just not enough to make Part 3 as interesting. But overall, it's still a good movie, and the ending scene really wraps up the trilogy nicely. If you're a fan (and you haven't already seen this movie) go check it out.