If "Frozen" is anything like this insipid, inane short, I want nothing to do with it. The characters, especially the snowman (Olaf, I presume) were grating and annoying, the music was unmemorable, and the plot was below preschool-level of intelligence. After seeing so many of Pixar's excellent shorts, especially "Bounding", this was horrific. Now I'm glad I never had to sit through "Frozen".

What a waste of time this "22min" long Frozen adventure. Even my own kids of 6y and 7y were asking me when does Coco start. What happened to the traditional short animation movie of Pixar? Those were always so nice to watch. And only 5min...

Will be brief as this monstrosity does not deserve any more of my time or energy. Really really bad. Thanks to the heavens Coco was a total delight wiping out the disgust that this LONG "short" provoked.

Don't review it badly because it 'wasted your time'. How many of you actually worry about how long a movie is or bother to see how long it is in the first place? You're sitting down at an over priced movie but this wastes your time? Okay.I don't particularly like Frozen as it's just been played too many times and even though I find it annoying this was cute. I liked it and it was refreshing. To people complaining about "OH WHY did they put it before Coco?!" He is trying to find family traditions for Anna and Elsa. He is trying to find FAMILY TRADITIONS before a movie about family and traditions! It fits, shocker I know.Regardless, it was cute. The animation was nothing short of the quality you'd expect. The story is cute and light-hearted and a nice short for the holiday season. Stop being scrooges people.