Samantha Stewart (Heather Marie Marsden) is a tough mercenary lady who shoots bad guys a lot. They are easy to spot because they all wear black masks. Not only during attacks, but also when they are alone in their hiding-place, maybe they like wearing masks so much, or is it just that the audience shouldn't realize the same 3 stunt-men are shot again and again? Anyhow, FBI agent Ethan Marshall (Frank Zagarino) wants Samantha to stay away from one particularly evil killer named Fedorov (Lorenzo Lamas), who is so evil that he shoots 2 of his own men just to test his new gun ('I like this gun!', he happily exclaims). But after Fedorov kills her friend Kordell (John Colton) and kidnaps her sister Heather (Jennifer MacIsaac), Samantha gets her Uzi and goes after Fedorov. Or maybe it was because Fedorov's men destroyed her kitchen? An action movie with a simple recipe - have masked men shoot at the pretty lady every 5 minutes to keep the audience awake. The funniest moment was when one guy hides behind a curtain, so bullets can't hit him. Very modest entertainment which is easily exceeded in quality by any television action series episode.

I saw this film yesterday.. I must admit, it's one of the most crappiest action movies I've ever seen. OK, you got this blonde babe going around in some black tank top. There's nothing really sexy about it. Just some woman carrying a gun shooting down the bad guys..Lorenzo Lamas plays the bad guy in this flick. He's trying hard to put on this Russian accent. It was so bad. The fight scenes were OK in some parts, but the shootout scenes were awful. I could've swore that this dark-haired guy shot this black uniformed terrorist off the roof.After watching this film, I felt as if the filmmakers really wasted their talent on making this pile of sh*te! I got nothing against Lorenzo Lamas and Frank Zagarino. Yes! They maybe good actors, but how comes they got sucked into this rubbish?Well, at the end of the day.. This is one film that shouldn't be made. Bad script. Bad directing. All pappy show! A totally awful 0 out of 10!

I can normally manage to find something really salvageable out of bad movies. Heck, I enjoyed Highlander II so much that I've seen it more times than can possibly be good for me and *still* like it, even though I now know the plot holes it causes in the Highlander universe. But this piece of cinematic dreck takes the complete biscuit.It is bad.It is, in fact, arguably the worst film of 2004.And the really sad thing about it is, it needn't have been. The opening scene was a scene of true promise. The story suggested that the plot would revolve around two rival gangs chasing after a thief who'd stolen their plans - no guarantees that would have actually been better, but at least it might have been interesting. Instead, through some deluded idea that t-n-a sells movies, what we got was 80 some odd minutes of laughably stupid film making interspersed with hysterically bad action - action that's made worse by the very obviously small stunt crew.If you watch one movie this year, watch ANYTHING but this.I think I'd rather stick forks in my eyes than watch this film again.

Unless you are a bad action movie craved masochist, do not watch this movie. The acting is horrible, the storyline is weak, a very low budget film. The star can kill 20 of the enemy's goons in one minute (the bad guys are the same guys used over and over again, there might only be 3 or 4 actors and they wear full body black outfits that make them indistinguishable from one amother)Do not spend any money on this movie - if you want to waste some money, send it to me instead.