If there were a 0 stars or "Wish I hadn't seen it" option, I would use it for this film. The acting was atrocious, grade-school assembly presentation levels. The male lead was wooden and one-dimensional. The female lead was over-the-top in everything she did. And the vampires...oh the vampires...just about the most stupid, incompetent, pathetic drama-class rejects ever. Each fight scene consisted of the vamps (dressed in corny black capes) HISSING and posturing menacingly....followed by someone staking one of them....at which they reacted by hissing and posturing some more. Honestly, it was like some sort of pseudo-goth musical at points, with both sides weaving back and forth in groups.

A pack of blood thirsty vampires attacks people in an American city. When their leader Alex Stone (Daniel Goddard) meets the mortal Estelle Henderson (Kat Hawks), they fall in love with each other and Alex seeks out her father, who is researching immortality, to ask him to be reverted to mortal again. The Illuminati Cartel is secretly sponsoring the researches since their leader Victor Price (Eric Etebari) wants to be immortal. Meanwhile, the vampire hunter Marshall Pope (Matthias Hues) arrives in the city to help the police to hunt down the vampires. "Kiss of the Vampire", a.k.a. "Immortally Yours", is a boring and lame low-budget vampire movie released direct-to-video on DVD with subtitles without synchronicity with the speech. The laughable story is a mixed bag of dull romance and a boring cartel story entwined with vampires that are staked on the stomach and dies. Further, the noisy vampires attack in pack, roaring like lions and moving their heads back and forth in a ridiculous way. The acting is awful, with wooden actors and actresses and the scenarios and locations are very poor. Last but not the least, there are many fake reviews in IMDb promoting this movie and luring the readers. You just need to click on the author and see when he joined IMDb and how many reviews he has written (only one). My vote is three.Title (Brazil): Not Available

This isn't the worst vampire movie I've ever seen, I've seen much, much worse. However, given the cast I was expecting more of the acting but perhaps some of that fault must lie in the hands of the director. The story itself seems spotty, problem with the script or the editing, I can't say, but it seems to be both a case of too many subplots -- vampire romance, vampire rivalries, murder investigation, secret society, and mismatched human lovers. The subordinate vampires in a strange little coven that has odd "living" habits, know far too much compared to their leader. Thus mismatch if knowledge is only added to by a mismatch of language and behavior that varies most gravely in the character of Alex, the vampire leader. At least the horror of vampire attacks is a nice change from a string of angst ridden, romantic subtle killings that seem to be pervading our movies and television show. While I have no problem with romance and even humanity in vampires, I think we should never forget that they are, first and foremost, monsters.

I have been reading a lot of mixed reviews and had to see it. The movie is pretty good. I did like the story and a different take on vampires. The acting was good by most and the effects were OK too. For my taste, I thought it could be more violent and think it is like twilight in a lot of ways. I thought the best part was when the vampire hunter and the police were fighting it out.I guess for a younger teen, twenties and tween audience it was very good. There have been many vampire movies over the years and some have been exceptional and others not, but this seems to be in the middle somewhere, especially for the young. Nothing great but nothing bad. I give it a 7 out of ten for a family type film. It was worth the watch.