the stupidest,dumbest,ridiculous movie i have ever watched,the only reason i kept watching was to see how bad it could get.how could anybody with any intelligence say it was good or decent or even not bad.the girls in their gunsling outfits were awful.nobody dressed like that in those days.i wonder what kind of mind dreams up stories like that.surely that movie didn't make any money. the title was appropriate. i don't know what else to say about this movie. it's so bad i cant describe it any further. also the acting was terrible. it's hard to get ten lines when all you have is bad comments. maybe the writers should read some new books and get better ideas.

You can hardly expect an oscar winner for this type of film, but it was ok in the end, although the last half does descend into a farce, with the girls miraculously being able to kill everybody, despite not being able to hit a thing five minutes before.In the end, 5 out of 10

With the help of a Gunfighter three Girls show what "Girlpower" really means. It's a typically Jim Wynorski film and it's a good one. John Terlesky as bad guy Carver dressed in black and with that typical "bad-guy-look" has a few great and memorable appearances. The three beauties Kelly LeBrock, Kimberly Kelley and Rochelle Swanson are really worth to watch. Give this movie a chance. You will not be disappointed.

First off, I can never respect or pay any mind to this comment because the "critic" completely bashes Kelly McGillis...not so much that I am defending McGillis...but she ISN'T IN THE MOVIE.Secondly, the movie wasn't that bad. It's obviously going to wind up on Cinemax at 3AM, but there's nothing wrong with that. It's not overly "raunchy" as the other comment claims.The actors all did a good job...the only problem I had with it is that Kelly LEBROCK (not McGillis) has a British accent which she can't seem to kick...which is a continuity problem being that her "other sisters" all have western accents.