I am surprised by the negative reviews, and it was why I.haven't watched it before, but my sister told me I will like it and I did. Well, It's not perfect but it's a movie, something you watch for entertainment, It's not a documentary film so facts should be 100% correct.My advice is that you have to watch it to judge it, don't rely on reviews.

D.O.A. Why not speak in your real voices English guys?..it wouldn't matter....nothing matters & I doubt 3D mattered. We laughed when people got hailed to death. Just awful. No more weather disaster movies....give me Sharkweek presents:Sharkicane: part 5, before a other one of these. The actors must all be in rehab community service or just NEED work. There's no good reason to do this UNLESS you have Marc Walburg's agent. The one who screws every other actor but Mark. Get new agents. The good news I wont even remember this review....

Watched this purely because I'm a fan of Gerard Butler and whilst there are some very decent actors beside him in this movie, none are performing at their very best with Jim Sturgess proving what a very poor actor he really is. There are very few surprises or plot twists for the viewer because you can see them all coming a mile away and a child could tell you who the bad guys are going to be way before they are outed in the film because it is all so predictable. This movie's budget was around $120m, most of which must have been spent on the special effects with very little going towards a decent script. Only for the real die-hard Gerard Butler fans.

Flamboyant science fiction indeed, but still a fairly good roller coaster ride of a film. Given the sheer size and scale of the satellite network and the massive space station controlling it, I wonder just how many decades into the 21st Century this film is set in. Not too bad I thought.