I was hugely bored by the first movie because this fat, lazy, belching always talking furry-ball is an annoying character and that the story and talent wasn't there also. At first, i found this English royal clone could be interesting because of the change of locations and misunderstanding but after 30 minutes, i couldn't stand it! the story is stupid with having all the characters meeting by luck when they need it, the English bad heir is an insulting copy of John Cleese, the farm animals are totally excruciating, the scenes are only about setting a trap but they are not funny and terribly long, Garfield's master is always transparent and lacks energy and Hewitt is again totally wasted! So it's really one of the worst sequel i have ever watched and i wonder if that really makes kids laugh??

Jon Arbuckle (Breckin Meyer) plans to propose to his girlfriend Dr. Liz Wilson (Jennifer Love Hewitt). She's on a business trip and he follows her to London. Garfield (Bill Murray) and Odie sneak into Jon's luggage and join him on the trip. Garfield breaks out of the kennel with Odie and hides in Jon's suitcase. Meanwhile, the late Lady Eleanor leaves her castle to her pampered cat Prince and next to nothing to her nephew Lord Dargis (Billy Connolly). Once in London, the lookalike cats get switched.I actually like the interaction between Jon and Garfield. I like the movie up to the point when they get separated. Then the movie loses what makes it fun in the comic strip. I don't care about all these other animals and everything going on in the castle. It's all very children's show with all these talking animals. I like it when sarcastic Garfield is the only animal who talks.

The first film wasn't great, and while this sequel might a very, very tiny improvement, it is still the same quality of entertainment, from director Tim Hill (Muppets from Space). Basically Jon Arbuckle (Breckin Meyer) is planning to propose to his girlfriend Liz (Jennifer Love Hewitt), and his pets, cat Garfield (Bill Murray) and dog Odie follow him to England. Meanwhile, Dargis (Billy Connolly) is wanting to inherit a mansion and fortune, but misses the opportunity to the regal cat Prince (Tim Curry), who looks exactly like Garfield, so obviously, the two are switched. Garfield lives in the lap of luxury with everything he could want, including a gang of farm animal followers, and Prince has Jon, Odie, a crumby home and lasagna. With Dargis trying to now get rid of Garfield, both he and Prince are brought together to stop his dastardly plan and save all the animals in for the kill. Also starring Ian Abercrombie as Smithee, Roger Rees as Mr. Hobbs, Lucy Davis as Abby, Bob Hoskins as Winston, Sharon Osbourne as Christophe, Joe Pasquale as I, Claudius; Jane Leeves as Eenie, Jane Horrocks as Meenie, Richard E. Grant as Preston, Vinnie Jones as Rommel, Rhys Ifans as McBunny, and narrated by Roscoe Lee Browne as Narrator. The jokes are average, the mistaken-identity thing could have gone a bit better, and the special effects don't do too badly, just like the first one, this is more for the kids. It was nominated the Razzies for Worst Prequel or Sequel and Worst Excuse for Family Entertainment. Okay!

This film is about Garfield and an identical looking British Royal cat being mixed up in identity."Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties" is not so entertaining even as a children's film. The plot is entirely predictable, and is not so interesting either. Garfield is portrayed to be unsympathetic and even annoying. Breckin Meyer's character looks entirely silly and redundant, and he could be cut away without much effect on the story. Bill Murray's voice over a Garfield is monotonous, dull and un-energetic. The lengthy scene where animals cook reminds me of "Ratatouille", but only 10% as adorable, entertaining and fun as "Ratatouille". Ian Abercrombie's character as a Smithee the butler is the only interesting and likable character in the film."Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties" is dull and disappointing. It fails to transform the magic from the original comic strips.