"Frog-g-g" is a perfectly fine exploitation film with some creature feature goodness.**SPOILERS**Concerned about leaked toxic-waste reports, Dr. Barbara Michaels, (Kristi Russell) finds evidence to believe the company owned by Huntley Grimes, (Michael McConnohie) is behind the series of weird mutations she has come across. Despite her best intentions, she can't find anything on him, and he threatens Sheriff Buford Lawson, (Robert Patrick Brink) to keep a tab on her while she goes about her job. When she uncovers more evidence that something's wrong with the chemicals in the town's water supply, she goes to the authorities but no one is willing to listen to her, and eventually her friend Trixie, (Ariadne Shaffer) finally manages to help her prove that the chemicals have created a monstrous mutation from the local wildlife, and discovering that the created is driven by the urge to mate, set out to stop it from carrying on it's reign of terror across the town.The Good News: This was a pretty enjoyable exploitation film. There's a lot to like from the fact that there's a lot of sleaze and nudity present. It's in for a fun time when there's a lesbian sex scene to start the film off, and it only gets better from there, complete with another one later one, a shower scene that comes complete with a sensuous massage to start it off. Even then, the start of one of the rapes is done with a straight couple doing it as well with a really long sequence that is really fun and definitely worthwhile. Also managing to work is the fact that the majority of the scenes are done in with the lesbian variety is where it gets really gets this one's attention. The fact that there's a really large amount of time devoted to the mystery about the chemicals being dumped is actually really fun, since it's got the fieldwork investigations, the testing in the lab and the fact that there's nothing that happens to make the townspeople believe in the story, as tired as that cliché is, works in the film's favor. Pretty much most of those scenes are pretty good, working to make sure that something is going on and manages to sustain a lot of interest in the situations. There's also the film's last half, which is really cheesy and fun. This is the creature's full-on rampage around town, and there's a lot to like about it. There's another rape scene thrown in, this time at a football game underneath the bleachers that is cruelly drowned-out by the cheers for the game, and then the creature joins in the game itself, there's some more great stuff featured. It's plain, straight-up cheesy action that is purely great, and then the confrontation at the Catholic school is even better. From the reaction to the creature on the campus to the methods of dealing with it and how it's finally stopped is really a lot of fun, and from all these elements makes the film all the more enjoyable. It's really the best part of the film, as there's some great stuff there. The last good part is the film's rather intriguing creature, which is a new design and doesn't seem too outrageous considering the elements presented in the film. All of these here are what make the film worthwhile.The Bad News: This one didn't have a whole lot of flaws with it. The main thing is going to be the rampant amounts of sleaze in here. Some might find the rape scenes so disturbing they'll automatically wipe this one away due to the mere content piece of it, and the fact that there's more than one in here is something to get over that some will immediately rule out on principle. There's also the film's rather cheesy-looking killer frog, as there's very little about it that won't produce anything but laughs, and it's not anything that will scare or frighten anyone. The last flaw is the decided lack of violence, as an exploitation film of this caliber needed more than what was provided in here. It's probably the only thing keeping this one from a bona fide classic, and would've made the other flaws more acceptable.The Final Verdict: Somewhat entertaining take on the exploitation goodness of the past, which has some great parts to it and not much else. Really give this one a shot if you're into these kinds of creature features or are in the mood for something dirty and sleazy, heed caution if you're not or ignore if you can't stand the sleaze at all.Rated R: Full Nudity, Violence, Graphic Language, several rape attempts and several sex scenes

I was truly looking forward to this title. It sounded and looked fun. The idea of someone making a cheesy 50s monster movie could have been worth a few laughs, but instead this title only bores. First off, there is almost no Froggg in the entire movie which is the biggest disappointment. I have to sit through 75+ minutes of lame drama and dialog to get a few glimpses of the Froggg humping a bare breasted chick. Why? On top of that the film lacks any sort of fun plot. I mean give me something thats a bit more interesting than just a bunch of talking heads. I wanted to see some hot chicks search for the creature in the swamp, I wanted to see some cuties dragged off to his lair in desperate need of rescue (Creature from the Black Lagoon stuff), I wanted to see a few goofy action scenes of the Froggg going on a killing spree, or it maybe escaping a silly trap. Something exciting! Geez, have fun with it, be creative! Who wants to sit through endless and tiring dialog scenes in a creature flick? My advice to the filmmakers: Keep going, your concepts are good, but your execution needs to be a lot more inspired. Have some fun with the creature, put the humor in the action and most important...put more creature in a creature movie!!!

Frog-g-g!: 5/10: Frog-g-g is slightly better than the average nature gone wild remake that one usually finds on the Sci-Fi channel running in a movie marathon some rainy Saturday afternoon. (This, by the way, is damning with faint praise.) It has a good sense of fun about it, a real catchy theme song and lipstick lesbian sex scenes. It is also a missed opportunity that tries to do a couple of things and pretty much fails at all of them. For example the lead scientist character is a lesbian. She is played by Kristi Russell who does make a decent movie lesbian. (A movie lesbian is a hot chick who likes to make out with other hot chicks preferably when guys are watching. This should not be confused with non-movie lesbians who have mullets, beer guts, wear hockey jerseys and will kick you ass for looking at them twice.) While there are a couple of brief lesbian sex scenes they seem a bit sisterly. (I really don't mean this in a good way). There is some topless hugging and kissing but nothing that screams good exploitation.Well at least as a parody of 70's nature gone wild movies it works right? Nope. All the parts are here (The scientist hero, her girlfriend, the reluctant sheriff and the big bad industrialist who of course is both the lifeblood of this town and the sheriff's brother-in-law.), but the movie plays it much too straight for a good Airplane style parody. Everything else is downhill from there. The movie has no horror at all and considering the plot consists of a man-sized frog copulating with virgins the exploitation is disappointing. (I'm sorry but when one rents a cheap C-grade Humanoids from the Deep rip-off. One expects a hecatomb of nubile young flesh and gratuitous nudity to boot.)Nevertheless I'm a sucker for nature gone wild movies and movie lesbian sex, no matter how tame, has never hurt a film. Neither has a catchy theme song with the dancing Sleestak.

it is so nice to see a movie in the classic sense. A horror film to celebrate horror films. It has the classic appeal of all the old horror films without feeling derivative . . A new spin on it. Worth seeking out and finding and watching. Scary Funny and Sexy. Frog-g-g kicks ass!!