I'm an one of the old Disney short film lovers, and after I saw this Donald Duck short film DUCK PIMPLES, I couldn't understand a bit, first, the title card didn't make any sense at all, GOOSE was crossed out and wrote DUCK, what in the world does that mean?That's not more, Donald Duck was listening to a radio and scary stories repeatedly appeared and frighten Donald, his couch even turned into a green monster in his imagination! Poor him! Then he met a mysterious bookseller, who gave Donald a bunch of whodunit novels, PRETTY CREEPY!Donald was literally enchanted by the scaring stories and the characters even jumped out, moved Donald into a semingly real crime world, it's very violence and creepy when Decetive Hennessey accused Donald the robber and ready to shot him and other scaring characters. When the commotion finally over, Donald started to wonder what else happened, or if it was just his imaginary or stuff.Anyway, I felt like it was a shame for Disney staff members treated Donald so badly, and it's ambiguous and terrifying, not a typical Donald's short, but still ranted 8/10, less than I ranted Donald Duck and the Gorilla 9/10.

It seems to me that a lot of Disney's old cartoons had sort of a nasty side, and "Duck Pimples" is a prime example. I saw it on a video compilation called Scary Tales which also included a cartoon in which Pluto gets sent to Hell and put on trial for crimes against cats (that one was just inappropriate for children).Anyway, this one depicts Donald Duck letting his imagination get the better of him, as characters from books start coming to life. Borderline violent, it hardly seems like something that people should let the tykes watch. The Warner Bros. cartoons always took a cleverer approach to these things.What I noticed while reading the cast is the presence of Doodles Weaver. He was Sigourney Weaver's uncle. A character actor, his roles included the boat owner in "The Birds" and the hardware store clerk in "It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World". How many people would realize that the niece of the guy renting Tippi Hedren the boat and trying to keep Sid Caesar and Edie Adams out of the store would have to battle a bloodthirsty alien and get possessed by an evil spirit trying to take over New York? So, this is not a cartoon that I recommend.I like to think about that. Walt Disney finances "Duck Pimples", and over seven decades later the niece of one of the cast members gets interviewed for Ron Howard's documentary about the Beatles' touring years. And last year's "Ghostbusters" was better than most people gave it credit for.

Duck Pimples (1945) *** (out of 4)Donald is listening to scary radio broadcasts, which soon has his mind working in overdrive as he finds himself terrified of everything that moves.DUCK PIMPLES isn't your typical Disney short because it seems like something that would have been made twenty years later by someone on an acid trip. If you watch enough movies then I'm sure you've came across that shorts from the 60s where people trip and before long they're seeing all sorts of bizarre images. That's basically what we've got here because Donald's imagination starts going nuts and he sees a rather weird subplot dealing with stolen jewels. The entire short just has a bizarre feel to it so it really stands out in regards to Disney and the type of shorts they were making during this period.

In this Disney cartoon, Donald reads a mystery book sold to him by an oddball salesman and becomes so involved in that his imagination makes it appear the characters are coming to life, making Donald the center of the mystery caper. What results is this detective-like but unexciting whodunit mystery that features these random characters, including one that resembles Jessica Rabbit.This is not the conventional humorous, action-flicked and bad luck-plaque Donald Duck cartoon. I didn't get a whole lot of laughs from this one. The attempt at the mystery setting is clever and the animation is great, but the overall story itself is pretty boring, unfortunately.Grade D-