Clerks II
Clerks II
R | 21 July 2006 (USA)
Clerks II Trailers

A calamity at Dante and Randall's shops sends them looking for new horizons - but they ultimately settle at Mooby's, a fictional Disney-McDonald's-style fast-food empire.

Reviews
Taryll Baker

Clerks II is written & directed by Kevin Smith and stars Brian O'Halloran, Jeff Anderson, Jason Mewes, Kevin Smith, Trevor Fehrman and Rosario Dawson.A calamity at Dante and Randal's stores sends them looking for new horizons - but they ultimately settle at the fast food empire, Mooby's.Following the incredible success of the 1994 classic 'Clerks', Smith returns to write and direct a sequel that holds on to all of the things we loved about the original. Delivering more pointless conversations about movies, women and their mundane lives. Nothing has changed but the setting, we still experience a day in the life of our characters. What's so great about this sequel is that it stays true to the original in such a way that feels perfectly seamless. The budget may be higher but this doesn't interfere, it kicks off in black-and-white and cross fades into colour, starting up a new chapter in the series.All of the main actors return, O'Halloran and Anderson grabbing my attention yet again, with a beautifully written script by Smith. Introducing Fehrman as Elias who was ridiculously fun to watch, especially as he tries to connect with Randal. He added a nice dynamic to the movie and I really liked his character.I greatly respect Kevin Smith for his realness in writing and directing, his love for comics, and almost anything else the guy touches. Even though he's earned major success, he still stays grounded in his storytelling. Dante and Randal have many great moments in this movie, but one of the best scenes they share is in the final act. It's sad and bittersweet, but ultimately ties the two movies together tightly. It almost serves as a service to the fans, but doesn't feel cheap or tacky.The only thing I felt lacked was the nerdy discussions. These became one of the highlights for me when looking back on the first movie, so I was hoping for a little more of that, However, I was thoroughly entertained when these discussions took place. The hilariously spot-on comparison of the Star Wars and Lord of the Rings trilogies was simply genius.Clerks and Clerks II were an absolute hit with fans and critics alike, thus I have very high hopes for the third and final instalment in this trilogy. Clerks III, due for a 2018 release, gives me plenty of time to prepare myself and re-watch these classics a few more times. Of course, showing some love for the other movies in the View Askewniverse including Mallrats and Dogma, also.Verdict; Clerks II is a worthy sequel and will not disappoint any fan of the original classic. A wonderfully written script by Smith welcomes you back to the store that assures you they are open.Clerks II, 8/10.

... View More
Leon Erbe

The first 'Clerks' movie made me crack up a lot, but this second part -well- this one literally made me cry due to laughter.The first thing I really appreciate about this movie is the fact that it is /not/ in black and white. It did not bother me about the first one, but I just think you can see things clearer and all.Another thing about this comedic beauty is that it actually has more of a story than its prequel. And this is where the spoilers hit: Dante actually does something about his (love) life and you do not ever feel as though he is nothing but an empty shell. You actually feel with him - or at least I did.My favorite scene, though, was the Kinky Kelly part. I lost all my sh*t upon firstly watching that as well as all the other times; literally the only scene to /always/ make me burst out laughing.If you can handle some obscenity as well as lots of hilarious jokes, this movie is a must-watch for you!

... View More
Avid Climber

Clerks II is all that Clerks. aimed to be but couldn't achieve because of lack of funds or experience. This time around writer-director Kevin Smith had what he needed, and it unfolded the way he wanted it to. It has the same feel as it predecessor, but smoother.The acting is better, in some case because they gained experience —Brian O'Halloran, Jeff Anderson, Jason Mewes, Kevin Smith — and in others, because they're seasoned actors, like Rosario Dawson, who plays the wisest and nicest character of the bunch. The sets, camera shots, editing, and images quality are much better.The diatribes are different, but have the same vibe. They're excellent, and the points well made, as usual. You'll laugh at the various antics, and appreciate the underlying romance much more, since it has a more prevalent share of the story.The only thing negative I have to say is that the ending is a bit Hollywoodish. but it's inline with the story, and is kind of the logical conclusion, so it's difficult to hold it against Smith.

... View More
R M

I haven't seen the first movie, but if it resembles the second one in the least (which it obviously does, because they share the same title), then I never want to see it. As far as I am concerned, this has to be one of the most tasteless, worthless and unintelligent comedies/movies I have ever seen. I like a good mindless comedy as much anyone else, but this just left me feeling like the lowest scum of society after watching it. I saw the rating and thought it would be a great comedy. At the end of the film I was not only convinced of its worthlessness, but also of the public's deteriorating tastes. All in all, the acting was pretty lame, the scenery was nil, the romance was pathetic, the dialogues brainless and corny (some corny can be good, but this was far below the bar for bad) and as I mentioned before, as a comedy, it was crap. Worse than crap. I'd rather stare at steaming crap than watch this again.

... View More