Castle on the Hudson
Castle on the Hudson
NR | 17 February 1940 (USA)
Castle on the Hudson Trailers

A hardened crook behind bars comes up against a reform-minded warden.

Reviews
ksf-2

L.W. Lawes wrote the original story, which has been made over a couple times. Garfield had only been in Hollywood a couple years when he made this. Garfield and Sheridan star as Tommy and Kay, with their trials and tribulations, as Tommy is in and out of jail. Pat O'Brien is the warden, his antagonist. Grant Mitchell and Burgess Meredith are in here with minor roles. The usual prison flick capers. Escape attempts. Prisoner scuffles. Pretty well done. Volume goes up and down, but the picture quality is quite good. Must have been restored. Directed by Litvak.. he and Garfield also made "Out of the Fog" together. Sadly, Garfield croaked pretty young at 39, of heart issues. He had been caught up in the communist scare of the 1940s. For a really Great Garfield film, see "Postman Always Rings Twice". Much better all around. Postman shows on Turner and may other channels pretty often.

... View More
dougdoepke

Cocky gangster (Garfield) goes to prison where he gradually reforms until given a break by the prison warden (O'Brien). Then problems ensue.Typically gritty Warner Bros. fare from the pre-war era. Garfield shows he's in the same gangster class as Cagney and Robinson. Watch him spit out dialog faster than a machine gun burst while doing a tough-guy routine. And who better to double-cross him than that slippery lounge lizard Jerome Cowan who could machine gun his own dialog as a reporter in dozens of period films.But the real scene stealer is scrawny, athletic Burgess Meredith, a brainy con who outwits the prison head-doctor (Grant Mitchell) in the movie's best scene. He may be the least-likely looking con I've seen; still, he and Garfield make a dynamic leadership team (as long as it's not Saturday!). On the other hand, goofy Big Boy Williams strikes me as a matter of taste.It's a compelling, if not original, plot that redeems Garfield without whitewashing him. Still, I'm not sure what his actual capital crime is when they lead him away, especially when the all-powerful Production Code insisted that justice be served on this side of the pearly gates. Nonetheless, his scenes with the warden (O'Brien) are nicely shaded gems of growing respect, while a lovely Sheridan is affecting as the luckless girlfriend. As this gutsy little programmer shows, star-studded MGM may have had the gloss, but plebeian Warner's had the grit.

... View More
jotix100

Tommy Gordon, a criminal seen at the start of the story, is a suave man. He is well regarded in the best places in the Manhattan of the era, where his presence is well regarded. Unfortunately, his luck runs out when he is found guilty of the robbery, he masterminded. His beautiful girlfriend, Kay, is devastated. It is hard to believe with all of Tommy's connections, he could land in Sing Sing, one of the toughest prisons in the country.The idea that he will have to give up his clothes in exchange for the prison garb, does not go well with Tommy. He does not endear himself to the guards, or Walter Long, the warden. After realizing his influence and good standing in the criminal world will not let him get anywhere, he decides to join the system in getting himself sent to the shoe factory. There he meets Steve Rockport, another con, preparing an escape. Fortunately for Tommy, the plan goes wrong for his friend, but he remains in his cell, when he could have tried to escape as well.Warden Long begins to take another look at Gordon, for he thinks he is toeing the line. When Kay, his lover has a terrible accident, Tommy appeals to Long to let him go to her. Long, who has a good heart, makes a deal with Tommy and allow him to go for a short time to Kay. Trouble follows him in the shape of his former pal Ed Crowley coming to see Kay and there is a scuffle among them. Kay, trying to protect Tommy shoots Ed. The police, summoned to the apartment, takes Tommy back to Sing Sing. Later on, he is found guilty of murder in the first degree and condemned to the electric chair.Directed by Anatole Litvak, this is another remake of Lewis Lawes' "Twenty Thousand Years in Sing Sing". The film is a good adaptation, but it has a fatal flaw: we do not believe for a moment the warden, any warden, would have allowed Tommy to leave the prison on his own word. Add to that the fact that such a high security place offered no possibility of escape in any form, although we are sure, must have been tried. John Garfield makes a wonderful Tommy Gordon full of bravado. This actor was always a welcome presence in any of the films in which appeared. He was charismatic, distilling a positive aura into anything he played. Pat O'Brien is Warden Long, the man who believe in Tommy, perhaps naively. Ann Sheridan casts a sophisticated aura on her Kay, the woman that loved Gordon. Burgess Meredith was Steve Rockport, the con man who wanted to escape. Jerome Cowan, one of the busiest character actors of the era is seen as Crowley.

... View More
MartinHafer

This film is a remake of 20,000 YEARS IN SING SING and while it is not bad at all (in fact, perhaps better than the original), the movie really has a couple lame-brained moments that you must be able to ignore in order to enjoy the movie. Without these dopey moments, the film merits a 7 or even 8 on IMDb, but come on,...these problems are pretty severe! For the first 80% of the film, the movie is pretty good fare. John Garfield is an ego-centric hood that thinks he's just too smart and important to ever go to prison. But, to his utter surprise, he gets sent to the "big house" and he has MAJOR problems adapting--after, he thinks he merits special favors and treatment. Well, all this is pretty exciting and fun to watch. BUT, the big plot twist is total cornball! When Garfield's girlfriend is almost killed, the warden feels sorry for him and lets him go for an unescorted pass--even though he was convicted of armed robbery, assault and attempted murder of a cop!!!! Talk about a hair-brained idea! Plus, at times, the girlfriend (Ann Sheridan) is pretty annoying since she seems to have absolutely no self-esteem or common sense.However, despite these serious problems, the film is indeed entertaining. Since I am a major fan of 1930s Warner Brothers films, I can overlook this. Many probably cannot and so there are certainly much better prison or gangster movies out there that are more likely to please.

... View More