This looks really cheap and like a student digital movie. The special effects look stupid. The sound is OK. There isn't much creativity here, it is quite slow. It reminded me of Shivers (1975) but nowhere near as good. There is little creativity in the filmmaking. All of Frank Henenlotter's feature films are awesome except this one. This one is really cheap and unimaginative. There are lots of hot naked women but that doesn't make a film. This film should go screw Monsturd (2003). Not very good with little hope of entertaining. A real disappointment.

Given the synopsis of this movie, I just knew that this was going to be one of those movies. You know the kind, the cheesy horror movie that is generically bad. But I still decided to sit down to watch it, as it could have a snowballs chance in Hell of being a good movie......it wasn't! This movie was not the most captivating or innovating of story lines, and I must admit that my focus drifted away from the movie shortly after it had started. I think that I managed to endure perhaps around 30 minutes of this ordeal before I gave up on watching anything more out of sheer and utter boredom.The characters in the movie were one-dimensional and didn't really have any screen charisma, and it was characters that you didn't care about or invest any attachment to. And having such cardboard characters milling about didn't really help the weak script one bit.I wonder what made writers Frank Henenlotter and R.A. The Rugged Man come up with such a script. Perhaps it was one of those scenarios where it worked out nicely on paper, but transferred poorly to the screen."Bad Biology" is a movie that I have no intentions of returning to finishing watching at any point. It just failed to thrill and entertainment, and as such, then my rating of "Bad Biology" is a mere 2 out of 10 stars. There are worse movies out there, for sure, but this one is a contender for the top listed.

Frank Henenlotter's first film in over 15 years and it's like the man lost not only his spark to make movies, but the basics in crafting a film as well. This is strictly amateur hour. Despite being shot on 35mm, this film manages to look even cheaper than it's low budget would suggest. An oddball plot about a woman with seven clits and a man who is monstrously endowed could be B movie gold, but it's just poor, unfunny and basically unwatchable. As much as I awaited the day of Henenlotter's return, I wish he just stayed a product of the 80s and early 90s. There's so little effort on display, that I can't imagine Henenlotter directing another picture. Avoid, or try to forget after viewing.

Frank Henenlotter the writer/director who brought us Basket Case, Brain Damage and Frankenhooker makes a much anticipated comeback with 'Bad Biology' and doesn't disappoint one bit. The very first line of the movie is "I was born with seven clits" and it just gets more and more messed up as the movie progresses. His lowest budget movie with terrible actors and appalling special effects but none of that matters in the slightest.I'd imagine that most people who see Bad Biology will consider it the most messed up movie they've ever seen. It's about sex addiction and the unlikely meeting of a woman with seven clits and a man with a monstrous penis with a mind of its own. It could viewed as dealing with sex addiction issues and an allegory of sex predators but most likely you'll just find it good, very silly fun.A random scene of a junkie chick looking for her "ziggy jig"(?) or something has me in fits of laughter every time as do the penis attack scenes and the vagina faces photoshoot.It's a movie guaranteed to polarize it's audience. You'll either consider it sick, disgusting, tasteless trash that's a whole world of wrong, or, if you have a particularly perverse sense of humour, revel in the sick mind of Frank Henenlotter in this glorious return to form.Brain Damage was always my favourite movie of his but now I think I may actually like this one best.