The Pillars of the Earth
The Pillars of the Earth
TV-14 | 23 July 2010 (USA)
SEASON & EPISODES
  • 1
  • Reviews
    afallenangel572

    I had only recently discovered the book by Ken Follett, I wish I had read it sooner and discovered this series. I was told by my professor that I should read this book. I Immediately went to my local book store and picked up a copy. I hesitated reading that book because 1. I am an atheist and reading about people building a cathedral was unsure of that, and 2.It was a pretty big book (Don't get me wrong I love to read I read all of the time I have shelves filled with books). If It weren't for my boyfriend telling me to read it I couldn't have experienced such an amazing story. I finished the book in less than three days it consisted of sitting in my apartment and drinking energy drinks through the night while my BF snored from the room over. Let me just say Wow! The characters were awesome and I loved the whole theme of the book. I didn't care If It was for religious people. Because it was really inspiring. I was then told it was a book series (I nearly died on the inside). I discovered the mini series when I went to look up the book series and fell on this very page. To my surprise there was a mini TV series. I quickly got onto Netflix and searched if they had the show. I had to pay an additional 7.99 but I was so happy they did have it. I told my BF (Liam) And he was actually shocked there was a show. We both watched it on our TV that night and became hooked on this mini series.The actors were amazing and Eddie Redmayne is so cute! The show is beyond amazing I loved to see all the characters and fight scenes.Of-course Liam looked forward to the fights. I also loved the concept of a witch which I have to say is real intense. Whenever something happened to Jack I would be there Like "No Jack!!! Oh god I hope he's OK" Like hyperventilating And Liam just staring at me. Yeah embarrassing. I recommend this series to just about anyone I loved it and watch it all the time. Yeah you can call me weird. But I loved seeing the pictures I thought of in my head come to life and seeing the Cathedral was just spectacular. Although the show is a bit graphic (*Cough* *Cough*) I think you should watch the show you will truly feel inspired and mixed emotions. I hope to find more amazing and inspiring shows such as this one. And recently I went to see Eddie Redmayne In The Theory Of Everything. He was brilliant his performance was beyond anything I've ever seen he is an amazing actor you should go see his movie. I'm still amazed at how great this show Is I am now reading the next book. I do wish the series could continue to go on but it's still amazing and I love it!!!

    ... View More
    Laura B

    My summary and high star rating make my overall assessment of this miniseries obvious overall, but I at least want to chime in on a couple of things I constantly see and hear in reference to this along with most other book-to-film adaptations.As with ALL film adaptations, this will NOT-and in fact CAN NOT-be identical to the book, and if that is what you expect or even desire, let me paraphrase author John Green regarding his book The Fault In Our Stars becoming a movie (when mostly young readers freak over the blue-eyed main male character being changed to a guy with brown eyes or the actress playing the main protagonist, who in that book happens to have cancer, being "too pretty" as if nobody with cancer can be attractive-granted the readers ARE mostly teenage girls--anyway, back to what he expressed several places to varying degrees of detail and all that): Of COURSE the movie will differ from the book-one consists of scribbles on paper and the other of moving pictures and sound! More importantly in my estimation is the arrogance of MANY readers. Arrogance? Yes, I DO believe it arrogant to presume YOUR way (when saying you/your, I refer to the person doing the fussing) of reading and interpreting a book and indeed the motion picture YOU envision while reading-the on the fly movie of your mind-is somehow more "correct" (I think there are as many correct interpretations as there are readers/viewers/listeners/consumers of whatever medium) or true-to-the-author's-vision or other self-righteous nonsense we all manage to find some time for when we could be volunteering to clean up the streets or teach or mentor youth whatever we're good at/knowledgeable about etc! I guess my key criticism is far less pertinent to the film than the people griping about it-something to be aware of in nitpicking is that what YOU find very important and worth emphasis is NOT going to be identical to what other readers do or what brush strokes-the broad swipes and the minutiae alike-were truly indispensable and/or moving/crucial to the plot's advancement or a character's portrayal/even all that memorable to the author and all the editors and friends whose input contributed to its making. I hope my little moment on a case of Dr. Bronners didn't waste every reader's time entirely. It's GREAT to be passionate about books-how rare and foreign (and ironically disconnected) we often feel in this tech age! Just remember that as critical as the book absolutely is to the movie or television program bearing its name, our brains filter and process scribbles, sounds (non-word ones in particular), and pictures differently-even stills and moving pictures are handled differently, as in they light up the brain differently when we're scanned.With that very long bit of feedback issued, my assessment is actually rather simple. The sets and the stunts are SO awe-inspiring that you could almost pair them with awful character development and still give it okay marks! The story, though, is SO well-acted, engrossing, and rich, carefully pieced together with impeccable timing and interactions you can almost feel the love, anger, jealousy, and utter turmoil from an absolutely GREAT cast--HUGE props for SUCH powerful older figures and especially for NOT making it a film of only overly pretty people! It is WELL WORTH watching in a long happy marathon or across two nights of grim weather. I believe it is much easier to stay with the story and appreciate how incredibly complex and nuanced it is, what an ambitious endeavor with a beautiful result they've brought to us. I also recommend you watch the special features making of pillars bit-it's about half an hour and you'll leave wanting to fist pump the air seeing this fantastic work come to life from a few different perspectives and a dozen different (camera) angles. Anyone wanting to get into film or at all intrigued by the process should really applaud this as they truly somehow organized something utterly MASSIVE in scale and right down to makeup and a good hundred animals to work with, they made it work AND HOW... Sure it isn't true to history, only based ON it. There's no way they could logically follow the book to the page-too much not only had to be cut or rearranged but also ADDED, pieces we fill in where books leave big gaps movies cannot-but at the end of the day this is marvelous and does a great deal of honor to the books, making details about building a cathedral just as beautiful and gripping to watch unfold as to imagine while following paper-staining scribbles.

    ... View More
    Armand

    each adaptation is a ball of expectations for its public. this is only a splendid success. because, after many historical movies, after series with great ambitions, it is different. precise, seductive, mixture between respect for novel spirit, realistic atmosphere, the best actors for each role. in last case, the nuances are all and the young Eddie Redmayne represents more than a promise. sure, at first sigh, presence of Ian McShane or Donald Sutherland seems be guarantee for a not bad film. but it is something more than a question of names. it is a remarkable work. this is its secret. and its great virtue. it is a smart invitation to read the novel. it is a clever key to Middle Age realities. at its end, it is just remarkable. and this fact is enough.

    ... View More
    jjnxn-1

    Almost total bastardization of a great novel. Whoever adapted the source material obviously didn't understand it and its strengths. They weakened both of the major characters, Philip and Aliena, and for whatever reason brought the royals who were just shadowy supporting characters in the novel too much into the fore. This IS NOT a worthwhile version of the book but some tired retread of the battle for the throne of England during the same time period with the novel's title stuck on. Aliena is miscast with an actress without the necessary fire to make her live on screen and although Matthew MacFayden is a fine actor there is little he can do to make Prior Philip the strong central character he should be since he has been adapted into a gullible milksop. The less said about the distortion of the character of William, a truly reprehensible devil in the book, into a dominated rather churlish mama's boy here the better. There are some good performances, notably Rufus Sewell as Tom Builder, but it is just not worth the effort to sit through this sorry enterprise.

    ... View More
    Similar Movies to The Pillars of the Earth