I had convinced myself I was going to hate this movie. Among Phantom fans, this 1990 miniseries (later converted into a full film) has the reputation of being the most sentimental and sweet of all POTO adaptations. Being of the group that likes their Phantoms badass and menacing, I was surprised to find that I enjoyed this version, in spite of its lack of Gothic horror and a Punjab-tossing Phantom.The plot varies quite a bit from other versions of the story. The basic premise I still there: a deformed genius living under an opera house becomes infatuated with a beautiful singer and seeks to make her love him despite his ugliness. Unlike other tellings of the story, this version lacks outright horror: the Phantom never directly kills anyone, they're either by accident or via booby traps, and the most homicidal the Phantom gets is when he threatens to blow up the opera. Romance and comedy replace terror, as most of the story's focus is on the love triangle between the Phantom, Christine, and Raoul, and the rivalry between Christine and the manager's spoiled (and talentless) wife Carlotta. That's not to say the entire film is all roses; the comedy and light-hearted tone of the film all but vanishes by the second half, where the story takes a somber turn as it concentrates on the Phantom's despair at being rejected by Christine and the young opera singer's love for both her suitors. The film is highly emotional (especially the last few minutes, which are guaranteed to make you weep) without feeling forced or sappy.As Erik (the Phantom), Charles Dance gives the movie much of its emotional impact. In spite of myself, I was charmed by Dance's performance. Initially, I was put off by his out of place American accent, the fact that he has a father in his life (which takes away from the character's sense of loneliness), and his tendency to preen the unmasked portions of his face with a powder puff. But once he started with his sarcastic quips, I began to warm up to him. True, he's a milder version of the insane Phantom we all know and love, but the character's jealousy and longing for love still come through, albeit in a less aggressive manner. And Dance does such a fine job here, conveying emotions purely through his eyes at several points in the story.The second best performance goes to Burt Lancaster, who plays Erik's father, the former manager of the opera who struggles to protect his son from the world while also protecting the innocent lives threatened by Erik's actions. The character has an interesting history of his own and you really feel for him. Teri Polo and Adam Stroke are less memorable as Christine and Raoul. While Stroke does a passable job, Polo's acting is a bit weird. Though she looks the part, she comes off as a touch ditzy rather than merely naïve.This film has the virtue of being filmed at the actual Paris Opera House. The sets are all gorgeous and the subdued lighting really gives off a Gothic touch. Special mentions should also be given to the gorgeous costumes and music.Though far from my ideal version of the story, I cannot deny that this version is one of the better incarnations in terms of quality. The sets are beautiful, most of the acting's great, and by the finale, you're sure to be in tears. Even if you despise the idea of a cuddlier Phantom, watch anyway. Like me, you might just end up enchanted by the time the credits roll.8/10

Every person I know who has seen this film has cried through the second half. It is based off of the Yeston musical, 'Phantom'. Even though it is strange for the disfigured Erik to have loving parents, it is a surprisingly effective point that matches the story perfectly, and does not subtract from the total outcome. The actors are perfectly matched with parts, and they never seem out of place. The score from several operas really bring it together. On it's own, it is very easily one of the best. It is different enough from the musical it is based on (as well as the book for that matter) to be on it's own, but still retains all of the power that you get from both. You hardly realize you are sitting there watching for hours at a time.

I watched this movie because I wanted to see what Andrew Lloyd Webber was up against. I honestly thought it was going to be horrible. After, I saw the movie not only was I very impressed, but I couldn't get enough of it. I loved the cast. I was extremely pleased not none of Yestin's and Koppit's songs were used.(Now, I saw the Yestin's and Koppit's play long before I even knew a movie of it had been made.)I didn't like what they did with Eric's background story. I felt that it took away from his character. I hated that they didn't make Philippe more of a hero and that he had scenes in which he smoked!!! I was disappointed that we only saw Eric's face once and that it wasn't more believable. His face also really wasn't scary. I also thought that young Philippe, young Christine,and young Eric should have, at least, some dialogue.

There has been many movie-version's of well known story of Phantom- the tragic figure, who has found home in the Opera house in Paris. But for my own surprise best version is not made for the cinema, but for the TV. Movies strengths seem to be the atmosphiere and actors. It is only Phantom movie that is filmed on location as well features french actors. Everything seems to be in place. You can feel one with the characters, nothing supernatural. There's not even silly clisés that seem to be necesery add-ons for any movie that deal with anykind lovestory.It is actually second Phantom of the Opera movie I had seen back on 90's and it is also only one that is equal in quality to Lon Chaney's silent movie. When you have a question: to see it or not, I believe it is one of the "must-see"'s.