There really is not anything wrong with this adaptation. Good acting. More than competent direction. Clever scripting. Nice settings. Joan Hickson. I love Margaret Rutherford and love her Miss Marple movies. I say that unequivocally and unabashedly, BUT Joan Hickson is the embodiment of what Agatha Christie wrote in her Miss Marple novels. Hickson is that good. She is barely in the first hour and a half, here and there - but comes on strong for the final act. Lucky for us most of the detecting is being done by Inspector Craddock played very capably - and nicely - by John Castle. The suspects are all played with unusual skill. Ursala Howells plays a woman who has her house overrun when the local newspaper announces a murder will take place at her home at 7:00. Things go as the newspaper plans - two more people additionally die in the course of the investigation - and red herrings litter the sidewalks where the characters walk in this film. Howells is very good in her role, as is Renee Asheron as her live-in companion. The young leads are all good and easy on the eyes(especially Nicola King). What I really was impressed with was that though this was made for TV, it in no way seems to compromise anything that would stand in its way of putting a cheaper product out there. Much of that credit should go to director David Giles - he has a very professional background preceding this vehicle. At the heart of all this is a quaint village, a cast of victims and suspects, a ripping mystery, and one Joan Hickson as Miss Jane Marple. I love her line to the inspector qualifying why she might be a good person to go nosing about - "An old lady asking questions is just an old lady asking questions. The music is also wonderful.

The book A Murder Is Announced is a brilliant book, one of my favourite Agatha Christies, intricately woven and quite complex. This adaptation is a million times better than the Geraldine McEwan version, and not only was it faithful to the book, but it almost surpassed it. The adaptation is lovingly photographed, with stunning locations and costumes. The music is beautiful, reminds me a bit of a day in the country, peaceful and relaxing. The script is well crafted, the plot is brilliantly constructed and like I've said already, the adaptation is very faithful to the book. The lights-going-off scene was very haunting, and gave me nightmares when I first saw this when I was 11, six years ago, just like in the book, that scene was underplayed in the Geraldine McEwan version. The acting was very, very good, Joan Hickson doesn't just play Miss Marple, she IS Miss Marple. There was one scene with a sideways close up into Hickson's face, and that moment in particular was extraordinary. Samantha Bond was lovely as Julia, and Ursula Howells was superb as Letitia Blacklock. Joan Sims also delights as Amy Murgatroyd, and before he did Inspector Morse Kevin Whately did this, and he is a breath of fresh air as Sergeant Fletcher. Everyone else was just as superb. In fact, I have no criticisms of this at all, the ending will have you completely by surprise if you haven't read the book, the length was just right and everything about this was delightful. 10/10 Bethany Cox

In the small village of Chipping Cleghorne, the local paper carries a small notice that a murder will be committed that very day at Little Paddocks cottage at 7pm. The residents of the cottage know nothing about it but decide to put on some drinks in case the joker, or anyone else, pops in. Several people do just happen to be "passing by" and pop in shortly before seven. At exactly 7pm a masked man comes in the door shining a torch in everyone's face and saying words along the lines of "hands up" or "this is a robbery". The lights go out and three shots are heard; when they come back on there are bullet holes in the wall, Miss Blacklock has a cut on her ear and the man is dead. Despite it not making any sense at all, it appears to DI Craddock that for some reason the man was trying to kill Miss Blacklock and, when he failed, killed himself. It is all very confusing but when Craddock is advised to speak to a certain Miss Marple, who has some quite helpful insights into the whole affair.Although it runs very long, this entry in the BBC Miss Marple series of films is actually pretty enjoyable and wasn't anything like the long slog I worried it would be. It helps that the plot keeps moving forward well with what seems like a lightening pace in comparison to some of the other Miss Marple films from the same series. As others have commented, the plot may not be the strongest that Christie ever produced but it does provide enough forward motion to keep the film interesting. The conclusion involves loads of revelations that I wasn't overly pleased by because it seemed to just take all the patient investigation done up till then and just p1ss it all up the wall. It is a pain because up till then I had enjoyed the 140 minutes prior but the "out-of-the-blue" stuff meant that I was just being spun a yarn for a while. I still enjoyed it in the delivery but this was a problem.The cast are mostly good. Hickson is the classic Miss Marple and her performance here is as assured as always and she is a good presence. The film doesn't really bring in her until the end of the first hour and it is to the credit of the rest of the cast that I didn't miss her that much. Castle is as reliable as Craddock and it was a strange find to have Whately as his DS (Whately being better known as Morse's Lewis). Howells, Asherson, Sims and others are all very good and I personally was quite taken aback by Samantha Bond – not so much by her performance but more by the fact that she only looks slightly older twenty years later.Overall this is quite a good Miss Marple that has a strong plot and a consistently well-paced delivery. The cast are all up to the task and it feels quite brisk and engaging up till the end when all the rabbits are pulled out of hats and I struggled to keep up with it or indeed work out why I should given that the final scenes seemed to be separate from the rest of the film. Still enjoyable but 160 minutes is a long time to stick with something and then feel a bit cheated at the end.

Spoilers herein.Christie is all about the game, the game for control over an abstract field where the narrator lives, the person that creates the world. Within this, she often places people who are doing the same. These are people who are bending the world around them, wresting with truth as it turns out.The BBC is about something altogether. No challenge, just simple, digestible pleasures in the form of interesting faces and places. They have a habit of swapping the creative team so that so that none of these Marple mysteries has the same director or adapter. The result is that though apparently similar, they are in fact amazingly diverse, almost a lesson in elementary filmmaking.Christie's device here is also her clue. That's the way she often worked. Here, it is a matter of the definition of sisterhood. We have the two rough lesbians, and (apparently) the two subliminal ones. We have the twin sisters separated at birth and the sisters whose revelation is the crux. We even have twin lamps and twin romances.(As with most of her books, we have a writer in the action.)Christie plus BBC in this case means exaggeration of the characters so that they are no longer possible schemers, instead obvious fictions. Quite apart from Christie's carefully woven plot, we know who the villain is because she is the only one not portrayed ridiculously.These should never have been made. The intent of the BBC is just too far from Christie's.But. But, dear reader, there is a performance so charming it rivets. Samantha Bond isn't a great actress, but she does understand what is going on in this BBC/Christie clash. She places herself where Christie would be: both participant and commenting observer at the same time. For some interesting reason, hidden in film history, redheads can do this with more ease on the screen. I'm digging into this.Ted's Evaluation -- 1 of 3: You can find something better to do with this part of your life.