Sam does a great job as Lincoln and I have to say I now picture this as being as Lincoln was.... Smart, witty and very quick and as he is portrayed in this film. I personally think this is Sam's finest work. The historical accuracy was well covered considering how much is lost with other shows and movies. Mary Tyler Moore did a great job and I think the film does the book justice which isn't always the case. I watch this at least once a year and I have to say it never fails to make me tear up a bit and make me feel glad to be an American. If you enjoy this period of our history I think you will enjoy it very much. There were important facts that were mentioned that are never in other movies or I think that most Americans don't even know. For example the fact that he had several losses close to him during his presidency. Covering many of the capricious fantasies Mary Todd had and much of the inner pain he endured while working through our countries issues. They cover much of his personality traits which are mostly ignored in similar movies. This is a great movie in this regard.

This is a nice piece of work, but far from being ideal. It was clear the filmmakers had little funds so that they used the re-enactors to show the battle scenes, and the color scheme in those differs a lot. But that is OK. The film itself is a bit too long and bit too unrealistic. Gore Vidal was a writer and he did bring a lot of fiction onto real events. But despite all this, Watterson and Tyler did their main parts well and that counts as a big plus. In general, not bad, but still, much weaker than many other Civil War films of the era. The movie pays a decent tribute to the life and sufferings of a real great man, but it often tends to drag along or slow down painfully quite too often. Recommended but with some caution

Mary Tyler Moore gives the best portrayal of Mary Todd Lincoln I have ever seen on screen.Sam Waterson gives a very different portrayal of President Lincoln than we are used to. Generally, when we think of Lincoln we think of a man with a deep voice due to the fact that he was a very tall man and was well built. However Lincoln in fact did not have a deep voice according to some reports that I have read, in fact he had a high pitched voice and he had that Kentucky accent. (Kentucky? The Hell you say, Lincoln was from Illinois, yes this is true, however Lincoln was born in Kentucky, he was raised mostly in Illinois though)This film gives us a good look at Lincoln the man, at the True Abraham Lincoln. Yes this film only spends a small amount of time on the assassination and spends none on the conspirators at all.If you want to see a very good portrayal of the Lincoln assassination that is very in depth, try watching "The Day Lincoln was Shot" which was a television movie made for TNT. In fact the "Day Lincoln was shot" is a nice accompanying piece to this movie. If you ever get the opportunity to watch either one of these films take it you won't regret it.

This was a well done movie, particularly for television. Sam Waterson's performance as Lincoln was well done. This will be evident to people who have taken the time to study Lincoln, the man, not what he is credited for. Lincoln is known for having a high pitched, "countrified" voice, which Waterson did very effectively. Lincoln was known for normally being a bit haggard looking, which was also portrayed well. His mannerisms and use of colloquialisms in conversation were accurately handled. The supporting cast did a fine job, particularly Richard Mulligan as Seward. Mary Tyler Moore was very effective portraying Mary Lincoln as they wanted it done in the movie. She certainly conveyed Mary Lincoln's mental shortcomings well. My only complaint is that the battle scenes used the same stock footage over and over, being that one can tell it was all filmed at one location. This is a good movie in general, and if you are a student of Lincoln, the man...surprisingly so.